DisneyKidds
<font color=green>The TF thanks DisneyKidds for mo
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2001
As for this MovieBeam thi.........................................(yawn)...................oops, sorry. I fell asleep there for a minute .
Do you disagree that Ei$ner is underperforming as a CEO?
If you think going from the 20% range to 44% is good, while they rate Steve Jobs in the 90's, then I am not sure if anything will make you see different.
Sorry, there is absolutely NO excuse for a CEO to ever be at under 25%, so bumping up to 44% doesn't mean much to me..............it still sucks. If the best we can say is that it sucks less than it used to...........well that is just sad. I wonder how many CEO's (of publically traded companies) in the history of CEO's have ever been at 25% and not been shown the door.Eisner moving more toward the center is positive no matter how you look at it.
I think you'd be hard pressed (actually it's probably impossible) to find a source that has anything positive to say about ME's performance over the past 1...3....5 years.
I wonder how many CEO's (of publically traded companies) in the history of CEO's have ever been at 25% and not been shown the door.
Well, I don't know about an army......................but it doesn't matter as all those losers will be/should be fired as well .Well, if you look at the rankings again, you'll see several. And that's just page one of this entertaining exercize. Now given the barrage of NASDAQ listings, you'd have to concede to the high probability that a substantial army of them exist.
Implying that since it's on CNN and therefore must have an anti-Disney bias and therefore should be ignored requires less critical thinking than simply accepting it at face value.
Sure - everyone has a point of view in what they write.