cinmell
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2000
- Messages
- 44,663
transparant said:As long as he'd DEAD I don't really care how he died. God Bless our Troops and WELL DONE TO OUR SPECIAL OPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
transparant said:As long as he'd DEAD I don't really care how he died. God Bless our Troops and WELL DONE TO OUR SPECIAL OPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nightowlky said:*Why* did it take so long to catch a one-legged man who's been killed three times before and was shot in the chest/lung?
Put it this way. Before 2003, Zarqawi was a thug who'd served time in Jordan for threatening to topple the Jordanian monarchy and was hiding out in Northern Iraq, after having been in Afghanistan, where Bush actually had a chance to capture him BEFORE the invasion but he honestly wasn't too worried about him. War was going to happen no matter what. I think Zarqawi was killed early on as some reports allude to:
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/11/20/zarqawis-dead-again-3rd-times-a-charm-eh
I think the persona of Zarqawi has been kept up to assign a boogeyman in Iraq that the American people could focus on to keep support going for the war. This isn't much different from the neoconservative attempts to paint the Soviet threat as much worse than it was and also for exaggerating the Islamist movement to keep that perpetual boogeyman of fear out there.
Now that the tide has turned against staying in Iraq, this administration needed to kill off the boogeyman. Pulling troops out beforehand would be admitting "defeat" (the US surely couldn't leave behind a horrible, vicious, murderous man like Zarqawi behind!!). Now, they can pull troops out and save some face and hand over control to the fledgling Iraqi gov't now that Zarqawi is "dead".
nightowlky said:*Why* did it take so long to catch a one-legged man who's been killed three times before and was shot in the chest/lung?
Put it this way. Before 2003, Zarqawi was a thug who'd served time in Jordan for threatening to topple the Jordanian monarchy and was hiding out in Northern Iraq, after having been in Afghanistan, where Bush actually had a chance to capture him BEFORE the invasion but he honestly wasn't too worried about him. War was going to happen no matter what. I think Zarqawi was killed early on as some reports allude to:
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/11/20/zarqawis-dead-again-3rd-times-a-charm-eh
I think the persona of Zarqawi has been kept up to assign a boogeyman in Iraq that the American people could focus on to keep support going for the war. This isn't much different from the neoconservative attempts to paint the Soviet threat as much worse than it was and also for exaggerating the Islamist movement to keep that perpetual boogeyman of fear out there.
Now that the tide has turned against staying in Iraq, this administration needed to kill off the boogeyman. Pulling troops out beforehand would be admitting "defeat" (the US surely couldn't leave behind a horrible, vicious, murderous man like Zarqawi behind!!). Now, they can pull troops out and save some face and hand over control to the fledgling Iraqi gov't now that Zarqawi is "dead".
goofy's friends said:Are you kidding me??!! and now the conspiracy theories begin.........
I for one am so glad to know he's gone as are the thousands of Iraqi families of those he terrorized and killed.
transparant said:You and me both. The fact that he was betrayed by one of his own makes me even happier! I guess there are some that aren't quite as happy about our Airforce taking this monster out.

nightowlky said:I think the persona of Zarqawi has been kept up to assign a boogeyman in Iraq that the American people could focus on to keep support going for the war. This isn't much different from the neoconservative attempts to paint the Soviet threat as much worse than it was and also for exaggerating the Islamist movement to keep that perpetual boogeyman of fear out there.
goofy's friends said:Are you kidding me??!! and now the conspiracy theories begin.........
I for one am so glad to know he's gone as are the thousands of Iraqi families of those he terrorized and killed.
I am very bothered by the fact that we (Americans) rejoice in human deaths though. I am very sad that we've all been robbed of an innocence that we once had.
nightowlky said:*Why* did it take so long to catch a one-legged man who's been killed three times before and was shot in the chest/lung?
Put it this way. Before 2003, Zarqawi was a thug who'd served time in Jordan for threatening to topple the Jordanian monarchy and was hiding out in Northern Iraq, after having been in Afghanistan, where Bush actually had a chance to capture him BEFORE the invasion but he honestly wasn't too worried about him. War was going to happen no matter what. I think Zarqawi was killed early on as some reports allude to:
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/11/20/zarqawis-dead-again-3rd-times-a-charm-eh
I think the persona of Zarqawi has been kept up to assign a boogeyman in Iraq that the American people could focus on to keep support going for the war. This isn't much different from the neoconservative attempts to paint the Soviet threat as much worse than it was and also for exaggerating the Islamist movement to keep that perpetual boogeyman of fear out there.
Now that the tide has turned against staying in Iraq, this administration needed to kill off the boogeyman. Pulling troops out beforehand would be admitting "defeat" (the US surely couldn't leave behind a horrible, vicious, murderous man like Zarqawi behind!!). Now, they can pull troops out and save some face and hand over control to the fledgling Iraqi gov't now that Zarqawi is "dead".

N.Bailey said:This is great news.
I am very bothered by the fact that we (Americans) rejoice in human deaths though. I am very sad that we've all been robbed of an innocence that we once had.
! Good golly, give me a break! 
chernabog said:I suppose 9/11, Pearl Harbor, D-Day and the Holocaust never happened either!? Just fabricated stories woven into the fabric of our imaginations, right?