AngiTN
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 28,152
I do understand how the chip stops someone from making a fake card.It's more secure because the chip is (as of now) impossible to clone. With magnetic strips, all people needed to do to clone your card was capture the track data on the card (via skimmer, USB card reader, etc), or even just write down your card number, expiration date, and CVV/CID with pen and paper. Many fraud stories involved waiters/waitresses at sit-down restaurants - since the card is typically out of your sight for a time, they could do any one of the aforementioned things to steal your card info. Then once they had your info someone could easily create a duplicate card or just use the info for online purchases.
With a chip card this is no longer possible since the chip constantly creates dynamic codes for auth and approval. If you've ever used a security "token" (RSA SecurID or the like) to VPN into your work network, this is a similar concept for credit cards.
You are right though, that chip and PIN would be the most secure, and it's a point of contention why the US went to chip and signature rather than chip and pin like most of the rest of the world.
I don't understand how the chip stops someone from using the card if they get it and it still allows someone to use it for online purchases, no?