Chefs De France or Marrakesh?

[hailbug]

Trying to decide between the two for dinner, I have never been to either one. Anyone with any comments on either please help me out! If anyone has any pics of the food that would be great!

 

[Havana]

I found the food at Chefs to be kind of boring. I was pleasantly surprised with the different and interesting offerings at Marakesh.

 

[Madhatter266]

Chefs has always been one of our favorites. We usually order the Prix Fixe offering (for us - onion soup, chicken and creme brulee) and it has always been excellent. This past trip we tried Marakesh and really enjoyed it. We had the chicken kabobs and couscous and it was very flavorful. The service was fabulous and I would return in a heartbeat.

 

[aadaneboy]

Marrakech hands down. The Moroccan food served here is flavorful, the waiters go above and beyond, and the belly dancing show is a great added feature.

You can find the food at Chefs at a lot of other restaurants, but the rarity of a great Moroccan restaurant are few and far between.

Head to Marrakesh!

 

[ncbyrne]

Have been to Marakkesh several times and always enjoyed it. The food and the atmosphere are great, and the floor show is an added bonus.
Chef's food was ok, but the seating is close and tight and it's much too loud for our taste.

 

[Mrs. Sojourner]

We also have enjoyed Marrakesh and have been there many times; one of our favorites. My husband is a fan of the lamb and I love the soup!

 

[crzy4mk]

Agree with all the above posters....I think Restaurant Marrakesh is one of the hidden gems of Epcot. Every time I've ever been there to eat there's almost no one there and you don't hear too much here on the DIS about it, but I love the food here! The harissa soup is spicy and yummy, and I really enjoy the couscous, especially with the lamb shank. You won't be sorry for eating here!

In contrast, ate at Chefs de France last trip because I'd never been....don't plan on going back. Not bad, just not that great.