In describing/recommending the college, she was mentioning particular aspect that they share with the college your husband went to, and comparing how the colleges deal with it.
Recently on another board, an exaggerated claim was made that, if toned down a few notches, has always rung true for me as the older sister of 3 brothers, and that is that our culture tends to treat males as "subhuman".
I always found that to be true in school, where girls were held up to the class as examples when they were smart, but a boy answering a question was just "normal". Eventually I stopped noticing the boys answering questions at all. And gosh if a boy answered before being called on, oh the trouble, compared to if a girl answered without being called on.
Because I noticed this kind of stuff, I can definitely believe that this college professor could very well have gone into the situation believing the female and not believing the male. Especially if he felt that the male was subpar in his work, which of course turning in an important paper with typos and errors "proves".
Then again, if I were a prof I wouldn't have an unsecured mailbox, (hope not at least) and I would pay attention to who sent the email with the paper in it first! Since it sounds like the male sent it first, that would kinda add to the idea that he did it first.
Now wait...if no one believes that people put papers into the inbox, then HOW exactly was the guy supposed to have cheated? To cheat like that, wouldn't it require that the other student allowed him to cheat? Following that logic, shouldn't BOTH of them be expelled????
Since they weren't, that's not logical (then again, when was school ever logical?).
It sounds like the girl removed the guy's paper, copied it and returned both copies.
With regard to "subhuman males". An excellent book is the War Against Boys. http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Boys-Misguided-Feminism/dp/0684849569
This is a "must read" for parents of boys and teachers.