MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2001
- Messages
- 14,950
Baez was questioning/accusing the witness about whether the whole video was to get at the emotions of the jury...something like that. It just shocked me (not really) that he would do that, after the Judge clearly researched whether the video would be a valid tool to explain a concept, and decided to let it in. Baez does that...and it irks me...blurts out something he should not be saying..."ringing the bell."What question was he bleeping kidding you with?
And no one else's home? How "rare" is this tape?Just had a thought--what if they found the same duct tape in Kronk's home? That could be a possible glove not fitting scenario.