bunny
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 23, 1999
- Messages
- 1,143
I agree... between the "children belong with the mothers no matter [what]" mentality, and the inclination to afford otherwise-justifiable deference to people serving our country, shared custody is not inviolate.
I totally agree. My husband's ex married a man in the Air Force. He was transferred to Korea shortly after that. The mom had a child from a previous marriage but three children with my husband. We went to a lawyer to get full custody. The lawyer basically told us not to waste our money. She said the courts always try to keep siblings together and almost never deny families of military people the ability to move where they are stationed. On top of that, once you agree to 50/50 custody with the mother, it is almost impossible to change. The courts still view the mother as a better full time guardian. She would have to practically be a drug dealing prostitue before they would force her to give up custody and then it would only be temporary until she reformed. He did give us a slight decrease ($50 a month) in our child support though since we now had to pay all traveling costs. The tickets to Korea were about $1000 each and that was 10 years ago. What a joke that was!
I hope the times have changed. But my experience with the courts have shown them to be anti-father. In my opinion all the courts care about is the money!