Granted I do have a fancier camera than some might take so video is better quality than my current camcorder except for my biggest gripe that it's not in widescreen so I have to edit it all when I get home.
As for corruption though, this is worth saying I think, the best place for digital images is to leave them on the original media until you're positive you have a good copy on another device. I don't think that takes 5 minutes and people should be careful. Pegasus I think is a geeky chap like myself so this is more to people that aren't so nerdy.
The act of moving a file is the riskiest process of all and if the photos are precious, ideally you should keep them on the source media with the write lock enabled until you've got the prints you want. That sounds overly cautious but the more you know about how computers actually operate and the shortcuts they take the more you'll believe me.
Finally to anyone using Windows XP, if the only copy you have of your photos is on your computer, then they are at serious risk. There are a number of serious issues with the way various versions of Windows XP handles photos. Just viewing the photo can alter it and/or destroy it in severe cases. Incredible but true. And as for the very helpful rotate option built into Windows, try not to use this on Windows XP. Use the software that came with your camera. XP can and frequently will destroy your photo when trying to rotate. At the very least it will lose quality each time you rotate it!
Sorry for the geekery but it's worth warning in case it's someone's wedding photos or childs first trip.