pdarrah
It's nice to know you are real, too
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 1,968
Hi Folks - This is my first visit to the Photography Board - probably NOT a good thing, I already spend WAY too much time on the DIS!
Anyway, I am looking for some thoughts from others about the difference in camcorders in the last 6 years or so. We have a Sony Digital8 that we bought in late 1999 - it was around $1000 at that time. Ultimately, probably not a good investment since we've only shot maybe 30-40 hours of video (much of that junk that got edited out) in those 6 years. The basic problem is that it is just too heavy and clunky and neither DH or I want to lug it around. Before every WDW trip (2 per year) we talk about bringing it "this time" and always end up deciding not to since it is one more thing to lug on the plane as a carryon and we probably would end up leaving it at the room since neither of us wants to carry it! Since we don't use it much, we haven't had enough practice to get any good at shooting video - which leads to lots of BAD video - which makes us even less likely to pull it out - and so on and so on!
Now, I know that when we finally bought a P&S digital camera we started taking a LOT more photos and (of course) more of those started being actually decent photos. We both had Canon AE-1 SLR cameras for years, but they had the same size/weight problem our camcorder has - we used them for stuff near home, or maybe took them on a driving vacation - but rarely dragged them onto an airplane. Our current P&S is a Canon A80 and that goes nearly everywhere with one or the other of us. We are perfectly willing to carry a small/light camera!
So, are todays camcorders small and light enough compared to 6 years ago that it might actually be worth investing in a new one? We were fairly happy with the video quality of our Sony Digital8, but we also still have a 16 year old 28" TV. A new, thin, 42" TV is in our near future, so if we decide to try again with video, we should probably be sure we get something where the quality would be OK on a larger screen.
Last time, we bought a Sony because that was what was available with Digital8 that we could find locally. (Important at the time since we bought it when we found out suddenly that my 90 year old grandmother was going to go to WDW with us and our 6 month old and we had about 1 week to get a camcorder before that trip...) In general, we have both been very happy with Canon cameras - but I have no idea if their camcorders are good or not. So any thoughts on Sony vs. Canon for camcorders would also be welcome.
Sorry this is so long - I just am really unsure on all this. I had no trouble figuring out what I wanted in a P&S digital camera, but seem to be totally at sea when I start considering camcorders!
TIA for any help,
pdarrah
Anyway, I am looking for some thoughts from others about the difference in camcorders in the last 6 years or so. We have a Sony Digital8 that we bought in late 1999 - it was around $1000 at that time. Ultimately, probably not a good investment since we've only shot maybe 30-40 hours of video (much of that junk that got edited out) in those 6 years. The basic problem is that it is just too heavy and clunky and neither DH or I want to lug it around. Before every WDW trip (2 per year) we talk about bringing it "this time" and always end up deciding not to since it is one more thing to lug on the plane as a carryon and we probably would end up leaving it at the room since neither of us wants to carry it! Since we don't use it much, we haven't had enough practice to get any good at shooting video - which leads to lots of BAD video - which makes us even less likely to pull it out - and so on and so on!
Now, I know that when we finally bought a P&S digital camera we started taking a LOT more photos and (of course) more of those started being actually decent photos. We both had Canon AE-1 SLR cameras for years, but they had the same size/weight problem our camcorder has - we used them for stuff near home, or maybe took them on a driving vacation - but rarely dragged them onto an airplane. Our current P&S is a Canon A80 and that goes nearly everywhere with one or the other of us. We are perfectly willing to carry a small/light camera!
So, are todays camcorders small and light enough compared to 6 years ago that it might actually be worth investing in a new one? We were fairly happy with the video quality of our Sony Digital8, but we also still have a 16 year old 28" TV. A new, thin, 42" TV is in our near future, so if we decide to try again with video, we should probably be sure we get something where the quality would be OK on a larger screen.
Last time, we bought a Sony because that was what was available with Digital8 that we could find locally. (Important at the time since we bought it when we found out suddenly that my 90 year old grandmother was going to go to WDW with us and our 6 month old and we had about 1 week to get a camcorder before that trip...) In general, we have both been very happy with Canon cameras - but I have no idea if their camcorders are good or not. So any thoughts on Sony vs. Canon for camcorders would also be welcome.
Sorry this is so long - I just am really unsure on all this. I had no trouble figuring out what I wanted in a P&S digital camera, but seem to be totally at sea when I start considering camcorders!
TIA for any help,
pdarrah