cardaway
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2002
- Messages
- 12,216
Marie17 said:Yes Mary Magdalene was a women. She was a follower of Jesus - just not a priest. The Catholic Church has lots of followers (both male and female) but only men are priests.
dwheatl said:OK, so no priest. Why not deaconesses, then? There certainly were deaconesses in the early days of the Church. I asked one priest (yes, just one, so I don't judge all priests or the Church by this) and he said, "Oh, those women were just tending to the household duties of the early Church."![]()
.
I've often wondered that myself. And often, a lot of the people who have a "problem" with it either aren't practicing Catholics or aren't Catholic at all.Marie17 said:What is it that people desire to have a female priest for?
Marie17 said:Very simple definition - utter confusion on most people. Difficult to explain but basically a "deaconess" usually works with the women of the congregation. People would confuse that with the role of a male deacon. Again, a deaconess is not the female equivalent of a male deacon. Can I possibly ask you to go to catholic.com and just type in the word deaconess for a whole load of information regarding deaconesses?
What is it that people desire to have a female priest for?
Disney Doll said:I've often wondered that myself. And often, a lot of the people who have a "problem" with it either aren't practicing Catholics or aren't Catholic at all.
They can be just as devoted...as a nun. Seriously why do people just overgloss nuns like they are second fiddle. Many important people in the Church are/were nuns.hidmickey:myantidrug said:I think what the issue is, at least it is for me, is that women can be just as devoted to God and His teachings as a man could but are still unable to because of a, in my opinion, dumb tradition.
Disney Doll said:I've often wondered that myself. And often, a lot of the people who have a "problem" with it either aren't practicing Catholics or aren't Catholic at all.

Gay marriage is not allowed for the simple fact that a gay couple cannot produce children naturally. The Church believes that the FIRST purpose of sex is to create life. The second purpose is to bring a husband and wife closer together.I think gay people should get married if that is what they want(civil service), however don't expect the Catholic Church to change one of its core beliefs.hidmickey:myantidrug said:Wow, I've never heard of the term Cafeteria Catholic but I'm glad I know about it because that is 100% what I am! I have several problems with the Catholic Church:
their stand on gay marriage (I'm just very for it for reasons that I don't have time to explain here), their stand on divorce [when my mom's aunt got divorced they told the kid's Godparents to take them away and not associate with their 'sinning' parents any further (which of course they didn't do)], and the inability of women to be part of the clergy. I also don't go to chuch every Sunday, just Christmas and Easter [and the rare occasions like marriage, funerals, and religious milestones for my family (baptism, first communion, etc.)] because I feel like if God is everywhere, you can worship in your time. I get sick of going to church and seeing people fixing their hair and picking at their finger nails (mind you, this is obviously not everyone but a vast and ever growning percentage). I hate how those types of people feel that they are then superior to me because they go to church every week but then couldn't tell me one thing that was said. I once told someone "Tell me five things that you did for someone in the past 2 or 3 weeks that would be nice and approved of by God. I guarantee that that tast would be easier than explaining to me the significance of the past two masses that you have attended." I just think that it is much more efficient and personal for me to pray on my own. I'm proud to call myself a Cafeteria Catholic!
ETA: I forgot about the Lent thing. I don't believe in it really. There is no way, imo, that right before Jesus died on the cross he said "In the 40 days before Easter (not including Sundays of course) you shall not do one thing that you give up. You will not eat meat on Fridays, Good Friday, or Ash Wed." I hate those kind of things that are "Church rules". I suppose I am pretty hypocritical in this sense because I do give something up every year because my great-grandmother believes in it and we are in Florida every year visiting her around Easter time. So, for her sake, I do practice the Lent tradition because I believe that that was the real point that Jesus was making, to be nice, loving, compassionate, and respectful for those around us.
I will now step down from my soap box to let you carry on with your tread.
MrsKreamer said:Gay marriage is not allowed for the simple fact that a gay couple cannot produce children naturally. The Church believes that the FIRST purpose of sex is to create life. The second purpose is to bring a husband and wife closer together.I think gay people should get married if that is what they want(civil service), however don't expect the Catholic Church to change one of its core beliefs.
The Church's stance on divorce is simple...marriage is a sacrament and should be treated as such. IF there are other circumstances such as abuse or adultery, then the marriage can be annuled. What was said to your family was wrong, but itis not the official stance.
Lent is a time of penance and personal sacrifice. It is a mourning time after Jesus died and before He rose. Sundays are not included because Mass is a celebration not something to be mourned.
MrsKreamer said:They can be just as devoted...as a nun. Seriously why do people just overgloss nuns like they are second fiddle. Many important people in the Church are/were nuns.
Wasn't it Peter who founded the Church, not Paul???
MrsKreamer said:They can be just as devoted...as a nun. Seriously why do people just overgloss nuns like they are second fiddle. Many important people in the Church are/were nuns.
Wasn't it Peter who founded the Church, not Paul???
cardaway said:She was his wife. Didn't you see the DaVinci code?

It's not that I have the desire to have a female priest, it is that there are women who feel the call to be priests and are denied their calling.Marie17 said:What is it that people desire to have a female priest for?
I don't have a problem per se, it is just that I feel that they are glanced over when people state that women are not allowed to answer God's calling. Around here nuns are extremely important. They founded school, hospitals...etc. At the grade school and high school I went to nuns were teachers, counslers, friends. My grade school has a small convent above the library.hidmickey:myantidrug said:Although true, nuns do not play nearly as important of a role in the Church. You don't ever see them in the Church of explaining passages, etc. At least around here (mind you it could easily be different where anyone else is), I could tell you one time that I have EVER seen a nun in the 16 years I've been on this planet. That one time was when we had a substitute religious ed. teacher. Outside of that one class for that one day, I have never come in contact with another.
On the other side, I question why you have a problem with us having a problem with it.
nuke said:What is it about women priests that you find offensive?
Jesus did not appoint priests, he had disciples. It was Paul that founded what we know of the Catholic Church.
georgina said:It's not that I have the desire to have a female priest, it is that there are women who feel the call to be priests and are denied their calling.
A nun is not very much like a priest, besides, there is a male equivalent of nuns - they are called brothers.
Jesus was a man of his times - it is only because of the time in which he lived that there were not male priests. If he came around today, he would not exclude half the population. The church does change its mind on issues, very slowly over time, and I do believe this will eventually be changed.