It just comes off that way because you are so focused on how much this kid asked for and how it is suppose to be able helping needy families with clothing and food. Clearly if the orginization the OP's husband chose a child through let the kid put that on their list they didn't think it was too far out of reach. That was probably the item he was strongly told not to expect but they let him put it on just in case a person with the means is who ended up with them. Yes the organization you chose says 30-35 per a child but most I worked with after having been blessed to receive through one had no maximum you could spend. Of course the one I went to was delivered to their home on Christmas with a Christmas feast by a volunteer (often the gift giver) so there was no well that family over there got stuff worth way more than us because you had no clue what other families were chosen that year and what they got.
It wasn't my intent. I wasn't focused on how much the child asked for. The OP said 3 things: hoverboard, video game, bike. It wasn't how much the child asked for as it was only 3 items it was what those 3 items were and really it was the hoverboard that was the main thing.
At the same time you don't know if that place
let the child put it on their list. Plenty of places get those angels in boxes without being looked at. Depending on the actual place they would have the ability to take it off the list if they wanted to and each place has their own guideline. Just google Salvation Army angel tree and you'll get a plethora of websites for each area that have different information/guidelines. And the intent at least from all the ones I look at are aimed at helping families in need/prisoners/rent assistance/senior assistance/shelters, etc.
Here's straight from Salvation Army's main website in regards to the red kettle:
Here's information about the Angel Tree:
So Angel tree uses the wording "less fortunate" and Salvation Army as a whole uses the wording "to aid needy families,etc". I'm not out of the realm of reasoning by mentioning that's what the intent is.
My place is far stingy if you will on the $30-$35 range and don't forget they also have a grocery certificate in addition to that $30-$35 range and that certificate depends on the family size. That's great that not all have a maximum but it doesn't make it bad that my local Salvation Army does. My point was more or less the OP might check their guidelines. Like I described with my work I believe the charities try to make it fair for all and sure not all have maximums. They aren't trying to be mean and say you should only spend this amount but they also want to give each family something versus one family getting a lot because their donor family had the means to buy a lot and another family not a lot because their donor family didn't have the means to buy a lot. Sure the families don't necessarily know but the charity does.
In either case neither one of us is wrong, we don't know what that charity's guidelines are, if they even cared one whit about the hoverboard or video game. You and I have differing opinions there absolutely nothing wrong with that either. Doesn't make me a bad person if I choose to give a child coats/gloves/small toys versus the hoverboard they wanted. Nor does it make you a bad person if you chose to get them that hoverboard.
We'll just agree to disagree on parts and move on.