Bushy

[slenkar]

Bush is a very Honest and popular man.

He did everything he could to defend this country before 9/11.

He has not taken advantage of 911.

On the contrary he wants to defend us against Iraq which is linked to terrorism.
Bush's
case for war is very sound and persuasive.

He has the full support of his cabinet and intellectuals.He wants to bring democracy to Iraq and stop Saddam's torture.
A christian is what we need right now.Any suggestion that he flew al qaeda out of Afghanistan is anti-American.

 

[bsnyder]

Just stopping by to say Hi slenkar!

Your thread is clearly not within the new debate board guidelines. So, since I don't think this thread is going to be around long, so I'll save myself the effort of a reply.

 

[acepepper]

Sorry, I thought this was another pubic hair debate. Carry on without me.

 

[bsnyder]

Originally posted by acepepper
Sorry, I thought this was another pubic hair debate. Carry on without me.

Baaaaaaaahaaaaaaaaa!!

Thanks acepepper - I am ROTFLMAO!!!

 

[Steve H.]

Originally posted by acepepper
Sorry, I thought this was another pubic hair debate. Carry on without me.

OMG!!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

 

[Geoff_M]

acepepper,

Rule Britannia!!!

 

[Galahad]

Originally posted by Geoff_M
acepepper,

Rule Britannia!!!

Indeed!

 

[MHopkins2]

Acepepper, I *totally* thought that, too! Until I saw that fklhou - er, oops! I mean slenkar - was the thread starter.

 

[Disney Debbie]

Darn! - Acepepper took my reply!! (I bet that's a first for us!)

 

[SuiteDisney]

Three cheers for acepepper!

ROTFLMBO!

 

[slenkar]

No-one can actually argue with the articles then? I didnt think so.

 

[teh fish]

Yeah, sure. It’s all about oil. You’re right. How could anyone possibly argue the point? Here … let’s look at the massive evidence:

Saddam Hussein has steadfastly refused to abide by more than 17 demands by the United Nations that he divest himself of weapons of mass destruction. He has refused … but it’s all about oil.
Saddam Hussein has used chemical and biological weapons against his own people … but it’s all about oil.
Saddam says he has no nuclear weapons program. Inspectors find over 3000 pages of documentary evidence to the contrary … but it’s all about oil.
Saddam says his missiles can’t fly more than the allowed 150 miles. Inspectors find engineering plans and other evidence which shows that Saddam’s missiles can fly to Tel Aviv and beyond. He lied … but it’s all about oil.
Saddam Hussein is on record as saying that his goal is one Arab world with one Arab ruler located in one Arab capitol. That ruler would be Saddam and that capitol would be Baghdad. But it’s all about oil.
The UN inspectors were sent to Iraq not to find weapons, but to verify that Saddam had disarmed. Hans Blix says that they have not disarmed … but it’s all about oil.
Hans Blix says that Saddam Hussein has not accepted the fact that he must disarm. But it’s all about oil.
The United States has an energy policy. All major industrial nations have energy policies. But the fact that the US has an energy policy means … it’s all about oil.
Dick Cheney used to work for Halliburton. Halliburton is an energy company. This proves it’s all about oil.
When Dick Cheney became Vice President Halliburton didn’t completely divest itself of any and all involvement with the oil industry. This proves that it’s all about oil.
George Bush used to work in the oil industry. More proof that it’s all about oil.

 

[PennConn]

He has not taken advantage of 911.

Slenkar

If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

Bush has done nothing BUT take advantage of 9/11. The more Americans wave the flag and support his _____ war effort (insert your own adjective here, you don't want to know what I think of the situation in Iraq), the less US citizens will notice the faltering economy, unemployment, skyrocketing deficit, ballooning fuel prices, and environmental devastation that have become George W. Bush's legacy.

I could let everyone know what I REALLY think of President Bush, but THAT would be in violation of Debate Board guidelines.

But I suppose Slenkar, because I DARE disagree with George W. Bush, that makes me Unpatriotic, right?

 

[Gail T AGAIN]

Originally posted by acepepper
Sorry, I thought this was another pubic hair debate. Carry on without me.

I also thought this was about a bad hair day

 

[catsrule]

Originally posted by slenkar
No-one can actually argue with the articles then? I didnt think so.

No, I do not argue with articles. Cats maybe, but not articles.

 

[Patrick IL.]

You put alot of work into this I believe if this was properly titled and worded as a debate in a debatable format it would still be on the debate board. It was not so its here.

 

[mickeyfan1]

Originally posted by catsrule
No, I do not argue with articles. Cats maybe, but not articles.

I argue with prepositons and verbs.

 

[catsrule]

Poor nouns.

 

[Richyams]

I argue with imaginery opponents....usually liberals.

I must be some sight in my truck.

 

[PennConn]

Originally posted by Richyams
I argue with imaginery opponents....usually liberals.

I must be some sight in my truck.

LOL Richyams

Well I argue with Imaginary Conservatives, so I guess we're even!