Bruce Springsteen's Op-Ed Today in the NY Times

castlegazer

Soccer Mom! Soccer Player & Mom! Go USA!
Joined
Feb 27, 2003
Messages
6,642
August 5, 2004
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Chords for Change
By BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN

A nation's artists and musicians have a particular place in its social and political life. Over the years I've tried to think long and hard about what it means to be American: about the distinctive identity and position we have in the world, and how that position is best carried. I've tried to write songs that speak to our pride and criticize our failures.

These questions are at the heart of this election: who we are, what we stand for, why we fight. Personally, for the last 25 years I have always stayed one step away from partisan politics. Instead, I have been partisan about a set of ideals: economic justice, civil rights, a humane foreign policy, freedom and a decent life for all of our citizens. This year, however, for many of us the stakes have risen too high to sit this election out.

Through my work, I've always tried to ask hard questions. Why is it that the wealthiest nation in the world finds it so hard to keep its promise and faith with its weakest citizens? Why do we continue to find it so difficult to see beyond the veil of race? How do we conduct ourselves during difficult times without killing the things we hold dear? Why does the fulfillment of our promise as a people always seem to be just within grasp yet forever out of reach?

I don't think John Kerry and John Edwards have all the answers. I do believe they are sincerely interested in asking the right questions and working their way toward honest solutions. They understand that we need an administration that places a priority on fairness, curiosity, openness, humility, concern for all America's citizens, courage and faith.

People have different notions of these values, and they live them out in different ways. I've tried to sing about some of them in my songs. But I have my own ideas about what they mean, too. That is why I plan to join with many fellow artists, including the Dave Matthews Band, Pearl Jam, R.E.M., the Dixie Chicks, Jurassic 5, James Taylor and Jackson Browne, in touring the country this October. We will be performing under the umbrella of a new group called Vote for Change. Our goal is to change the direction of the government and change the current administration come November.

Like many others, in the aftermath of 9/11, I felt the country's unity. I don't remember anything quite like it. I supported the decision to enter Afghanistan and I hoped that the seriousness of the times would bring forth strength, humility and wisdom in our leaders. Instead, we dived headlong into an unnecessary war in Iraq, offering up the lives of our young men and women under circumstances that are now discredited. We ran record deficits, while simultaneously cutting and squeezing services like afterschool programs. We granted tax cuts to the richest 1 percent (corporate bigwigs, well-to-do guitar players), increasing the division of wealth that threatens to destroy our social contract with one another and render mute the promise of "one nation indivisible."

It is through the truthful exercising of the best of human qualities - respect for others, honesty about ourselves, faith in our ideals - that we come to life in God's eyes. It is how our soul, as a nation and as individuals, is revealed. Our American government has strayed too far from American values. It is time to move forward. The country we carry in our hearts is waiting.

Bruce Springsteen is a writer and performer.
 
Thanks for posting this. I knew there were great reasons to love Bruce! It's very well written.
 
I love Springsteen as a performer, musician and songwriter. He has been vocal in the past regarding his politics. He used his stage to criticize the Reagan administration during his Born In The USA tour, which is fine, that's his right. I understand where he is coming from and respect his right to voice his opinion. A lot of his statements are true and he has donated much of his time and money to many worthwhile causes. On the flip side, as he stated in this op-ed piece, he has been the recipient of many tax breaks due to his income and status. I wonder if he refused to accept any of these "gifts"?

Having said all this, I still love the man as an entertainer and will continue to buy his albums and videos as they seem to reach a chord with me, no pun intended. "The Rising" is perhaps one of his greatest efforts

Rock on, Bruce.
 
As much as I like Springsteen's music, you won't see me at that concert. I don't believe in mixing politics with performances. I feel it's infringing on my right to listen to the music without bias or personal politics being espoused. I don't pay money to hear someone else's views. I pay money to hear music. If his views are in the music, that's one thing. If he's going to stand up there and give a political schtick (which he has, on occasion, been known to do), forget it.
 

You can sense an interesting humility behind his words. I think Bruce rocks.
 
Originally posted by DukeStreetKing
Having said all this, I still love the man as an entertainer and will continue to buy his albums and videos as they seem to reach a chord with me, no pun intended. "The Rising" is perhaps one of his greatest efforts

Rock on, Bruce.
::yes::
 
I think it is fantastic that Bruce Springsteen and others are using their celebrity to promote a cause they believe in. Despite how many here would like to deride the validity of a celebrity's opinion, the fact of the matter is that they are recognized people, and the general populace hears what they have to say (even if they don't listen to it ;) ).

Unlike many who've spoken up here and on other threads about this subject, I feel that more celebrities should speak out on issues they are concerned about--and yes, whether or not I agree with them. At the very least, it may get people to think about issues they may normally have not considered before. And thinking is a *good* thing!
 
Ugh! So Dave Matthews, James Taylor, REM, and Pearl Jam jumped on the bandwagon and are now all on my non-listening list, too! Most of these lefty musicians and actors in Hollywood barely have a high school education! Why do they continue to spew out what they do as if they are making important points?
 
Originally posted by Kendra17
Ugh! So Dave Matthews, James Taylor, REM, and Pearl Jam jumped on the bandwagon and are now all on my non-listening list, too! Most of these lefty musicians and actors in Hollywood barely have a high school education! Why do they continue to spew out what they do as if they are making important points?
:rolleyes:

Why is it that some people can't seem to disagree with something a "hollywood liberal" says without trying to make them seem like complete idiots? Ben Affleck was in front of more cameras during the DNC convention than John Kerry was, and quite frankly, he made the "experts" on Faux News look like complete bafoons....yet I don't think he has much more than a high school education...

If you have a criticism of Bruce's argument, then say so....
 
DukeStreetKing,

That is the beauty of being a Democrat, you can espouse one belief publicly while eschewing it privately and partaking in the very "perks" you profess to distance yourself from.

Bob Seger said it best in his song UMC:

"I pretend to be liberal, but sure support the GOP,
as part of the UMC "

We don't try to make these people look like complete idiots, as wvrevy suggests....They do a good job of that themselves...we just point it out.
 
I have enjoyed the Boss's music for many years, however I am not going to let his or any other entertainer's opnion become mine. He has no more understanding of the issues then the common man that he sings about. I will make my own choice not his. I will continue to listen to his music and respect his right to his own opnion. I watched Ben Affleck on Fox New and thought he got his point across. He did not make bafoons out of anybody. The only bafoon I saw was Michael Moore and he did not need help from anyone.
 
I saw Ben Afleck on several of the news shows, and while I don't agree he made anyone look like a bafoon, I do think he was thoughtful and well versed on the issues.

I have no problem with any of these artists expressing their right to speak their views. As long as they advertise their concerts in this light. I do have a problem with springing their views on an unsuspecting audience who have only paid their money for the musical entertainment and instead get treated to a political discourse.

I also respect the right of the public to express their views, through boycotting or tuning out performers who have taken a stand on an issue. Unforunately, many of these performers don't think that's fair and that it's somehow stifling their free speech.

:confused:

As for Bruce Springsteen, I adore his music. Always have and his political views won't change that. I've paid big $$$ to go to several of his concerts, and I may do so again. I wouldn't pay to go to this concert, because of the stated political nature, but I'm sure I'd jump at the chance if offered free tickets. It wouldn't bother me in the least to hear him speak the views he wrote in his editorial, I just don't want to finance his ability to do so.

Here's the paragraph of his op-ed peice that caught my eye:

Why is it that the wealthiest nation in the world finds it so hard to keep its promise and faith with its weakest citizens? Why do we continue to find it so difficult to see beyond the veil of race? How do we conduct ourselves during difficult times without killing the things we hold dear? Why does the fulfillment of our promise as a people always seem to be just within grasp yet forever out of reach?

Is there maybe just a fundamental difference in outlook, among Convervatives and Liberals, that's at the heart of this statement. I don't mean differences in policy. Maybe it's an optimist/pesimist thing?

Because I think we do keep our promise and faith with our weakest citizens. I think we've made, and continue to make great progress on the issue of race, and that we've conducted ourselves during difficult times with honor and resolve.

Are we perfect? Hell no. We've still got problems and issues in this country that we need to work on and solve. But we do try, and things just don't seem as bleak to me, as they obviously do to him. Just look back at the history of this country and the many advances we've made, as a society and a nation! The people who lived in this country 100 years ago surely wouldn't recognize this nation today on issues like race, labor laws, personal freedom, prosperity, education, healthcare, safety, daily convenience, etc.

I'd suggest that the answer to his last question - "Why does the fulfillment of our promise as a people always seem to be just within grasp yet forever out of reach?" is that maybe he just keeps changing the goalposts.
 
Welll....Ok, maybe I already thought the Faux News folks were bafoons, so it didn't have as much to do with Affleck as I thought ;)

The point was really that he is an extremely intelligent man, with a truly keen political mind, and yet he is also a "hollywood liberal". I'm really arguing against the generalization of "celebrities are stupid" more so than trying to point out the bafoonery at Faux. No, their views are no more valid than anyone else's. But they are also not LESS valid, simply because of their celebrity status.
 
I do agree with that most are not stupid. However when they start making statements like I am going to leave the country if that man is elected president, then some start to show their lack of "smarts". Affleck presented his opinion in a very good light. Some like Whoppi Goldberg and Linda Rondstat (sp). However do it quite Stupidly. And I am sorry but in my opinion, Martin Sheen thinks he is the President and Barbra Streisand thinks she is the Queen of America.
 
You won't catch me within 1000 feet of this concert, however at least this time they are giving the audience warning before they start to spew their political agenda.
 
Originally posted by wvrevy
No, their views are no more valid than anyone else's. But they are also not LESS valid, simply because of their celebrity status.

EXACTLY, wvrevy. I actually have to laugh out loud at the criticism of celebs stating their opinions......since the very people roasting them about it are, in fact, stating THEIR opinion publicly. So......does that make them the very thing they are accusing the celebs of being? :confused:
 
We granted tax cuts to the richest 1 percent (corporate bigwigs, well-to-do guitar players), increasing the division of wealth that threatens to destroy our social contract with one another and render mute the promise of "one nation indivisible.

He is aware that he can give as much money as he wants to whatever cause he would like, right????? Hell he can even it give it to the government for social programs if he is so worried.
 
I love The Boss and am glad he's a Jersey Boy. Bruce is well known here for giving tons of money to help others, most of it does not get publicized.
 
Originally posted by BedKnobbery2
EXACTLY, wvrevy. I actually have to laugh out loud at the criticism of celebs stating their opinions......since the very people roasting them about it are, in fact, stating THEIR opinion publicly. So......does that make them the very thing they are accusing the celebs of being? :confused:


I absolutely have no problem with celebrities stating their opinions. What I have a problem with is where and when they state them. At a concert, I'm a paying, captive audience with no forewarning in most instances. I don't want to hear opinions in that venue....if I did, I would attend a political rally.

I happen to love Springsteen. I've seen him more times than I can count. I believe his philosophy is a good one and he does support his causes publically. I don't have any problem with that at any time in a concert because he's usually supporting local businesses, schools and charities on a grassroots level. And he does it quietly with no political finger pointing. I draw the line, though, at concerts that are actively promoting political change. It's not my thing and I won't support them.
 
Originally posted by BedKnobbery2
EXACTLY, wvrevy. I actually have to laugh out loud at the criticism of celebs stating their opinions......since the very people roasting them about it are, in fact, stating THEIR opinion publicly. So......does that make them the very thing they are accusing the celebs of being? :confused:

Then I take it you also don't agree with the celebrities who complain that their free speech is being stifiled when the consumers who pay them for their entertainment talents decide, after hearing them spout their political views, to spend those dollars elsewhere?
 















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top