We are currently thinking of purchasing points direct with
DVC. We want to be able to stay at Riviera and also other resorts so resale is not an option for us.
Which resort would you choose? VGF or RIV? We like both. Thinking VGF may be the better choice long term if we ever have to sell.
Also I’m struggling on the break even point. What’s the easiest formula to use?
First, do not try to speculate that, "this resort might have slightly better resale value in 20 years." You really don't know, and it's not worth making a decision based on which resort might re-sell for a 3% more than another. If for example, you're re-selling in 2040.... It's possible that Riviera has higher resale considering it might be the only truly available DVC in the Epcot area, while VGF has a lot of competition, and 30 remaining years versus "only" 24 years. You really just can't speculate.
So here is what I'd base my decision on:
1 -- Location. Do you prefer being on the monorail, or easy skyliner access to Epcot and DHS? Personally, I love being in the Magic Kingdom area with small kids, but as my kids have gotten older, looking at older teens, adult-only trips, I like being in the Epcot area.
2 -- Sprawling resort versus compact tower -- Both have their fans. Some like a spread out layout, personally, I like that at Riviera, it's never more than a 3 minute walk to the pool or dining.
3-- Preference for general vibe of the resort -- "opulence" versus "casual elegance." That's the best way I can put it.
That's basically it. There are some other minor considerations, dues are slightly higher at Riviera. Riviera rooms can be booked for fewer points than VGF... With the addition at VGF, VGF may be very "studio heavy"... where Riviera may have a better mix of rooms, including the option of the Tower Studios. Meanwhile, if you love the "resort studio," that's only found at VGF. But overall, room size and quality is similar. Both resorts have great dining, but it's not like you'd eat a Victorias and Alberts five nights in a row, so I wouldn't be too swayed by dining in either direction. Pool quality is very similar.
As for financial break even point -- At direct pricing, compared to renting points, it's in the ballpark of 16-22 years. Disney claims it's like 7 years -- But they are comparing it to rack rate, not to renting points. They are ignoring dues, only looking at the purchase cost, and they are assuming rack rates would never get discounted. So if you didn't have to pay dues, and your only option was to pay undiscounted rack rate, then you'd break even in 7-8 years. In reality, it's closer to 20 years.