mommaU4
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2005
- Messages
- 44,339
I found this little bit of info in the October issue of Redbook magazine (under the "Your Life Now" section) and thought it was interesting.
Quote:
"Breast-feeding is the ideal method of feeding and nuturing infants."
You could soon find those words of bottles of baby formula if legislation propsed by Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat, Iowa) passes.
Sure the health benefits of breast-feeding for mother and child are undeniable, but is a law-mandated warning label going too far? Unquote
They talked to two experts, one a neonatologist and medical director of lactation services who said, "I think it's a great idea. Using formula is a risky behaviour. It's a life and death issue and a health care cost issue. Babies who are breast-fed have less asthma, obesity, and ear infections. Breast-feeding is not just a life-style choice, it's a medical issue. We as doctors have an obligation to give women this information."
And the other, a pediatrician and professor of nutritional sciences, who said, "While breast milk is more beneficial, formula is not in any way dangerous for an infant's health, and in many cases is the only option for families during the first year of life at some point in time. Personally, I would be strongly opposed to a "warning label"...and cannot believe this would pass."
I personally think it's a bit much. Don't most women already know that breast-feeding is the best choice if at all possible.
I have four kids. With the first two I tried to nurse and it didn't work out so I used formula.
With the last two, who were twins, I didn't even try, just went right for the formula.
I'd heard all the arguments for both sides and honestly even if there was such a "warning label" as they called it, it wouldn't have deterred me from using the formula, so is this label really neccessary?
Just wondering what others thought?
Quote:
"Breast-feeding is the ideal method of feeding and nuturing infants."
You could soon find those words of bottles of baby formula if legislation propsed by Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat, Iowa) passes.
Sure the health benefits of breast-feeding for mother and child are undeniable, but is a law-mandated warning label going too far? Unquote
They talked to two experts, one a neonatologist and medical director of lactation services who said, "I think it's a great idea. Using formula is a risky behaviour. It's a life and death issue and a health care cost issue. Babies who are breast-fed have less asthma, obesity, and ear infections. Breast-feeding is not just a life-style choice, it's a medical issue. We as doctors have an obligation to give women this information."
And the other, a pediatrician and professor of nutritional sciences, who said, "While breast milk is more beneficial, formula is not in any way dangerous for an infant's health, and in many cases is the only option for families during the first year of life at some point in time. Personally, I would be strongly opposed to a "warning label"...and cannot believe this would pass."
I personally think it's a bit much. Don't most women already know that breast-feeding is the best choice if at all possible.
I have four kids. With the first two I tried to nurse and it didn't work out so I used formula.
With the last two, who were twins, I didn't even try, just went right for the formula.
I'd heard all the arguments for both sides and honestly even if there was such a "warning label" as they called it, it wouldn't have deterred me from using the formula, so is this label really neccessary?
Just wondering what others thought?

Amanda!
It's not easy being a parent whatever decisions you make.