I can think of at least 3 groups that can be quite substantial:
1) Those who would rather get a lump sum of $120/pt, $100/pt, $80/pt, $60/pt (or whatever the price might be in a given year, between now and 2042) versus holding a worthless asset in 2042.
2) Those who purchased for $70/pt-$90/pt and would prefer to say that they vacationed for 15-20 years and "still made a profit".
3) Those who've used it for many years, are now older, and realize their kids are not interested in a timeshare and its associated liabilities/stigmas.
But even if the supply at the resort is restricted for reasons you suggest, the demand side will also become more and more restricted if prices don't drop. There are quite a few people here who won't buy a resort with an 18-year life at current prices. That group would be much bigger if the resort life was 15, 12, or 8 years and prices didn't go down to reflect that. Some seller may indeed "never sell", but those who sell for the reasons I suggested, will have to compromise for lower prices as time passes.
I understand the line of thinking here, but the 3 options you list are a specific (and I believe minority) group of owners with one thing in common…they all require the owner to settle for whatever cost because they believe it’s use and cost was low enough, or they got good use of it, and don’t think at all about it’s actual value.
For example, (and this is not comparing apples to apples obviously, just an example of similar reasoning).I bought a Chanel handbag 15 years ago that I got for $200. I used it everyday and loved it! They release a new bag that costs $1500 which is all the rage. My bag is worth over $1500 because it’s vintage and no longer available (ie sold out resorts). But I got good use of it, so getting $500 quick vs getting what it’s actually worth, is a good deal. I only paid $250, used it for 15 years & doubled my money.SCORE! Vs, I could’ve & should’ve been more prudent and got the value it’s actually worth. Or, I can keep using it for the reason I bought it and carry it until it completely falls apart. In that scenario (buying with the intent to use & not for resale value) is the best value and its resale value means nothing.
Very hard for me to accurately explain what I’m trying to convey, except that all 3 scenarios you list require the owner to basically be OK with not leveraging the actual value and its intended use. Prepaying for vacations.
I feel very confidently that most
DVC owners buy DVC with the intent of using it for DVC resort vacations, not at all a financial investment. So, by that rationale, staying at the two hardest resorts to book for the next 19 years has the exact same value today as it will on the very last day of 2042. On that date I think the vast majority of owners will still own their points.
Its resale value may diminish as the end date looms, but its actual value increases significantly for owners the longer they hold it. I just don’t see many owners deciding to “jump ship” just because the contract is nearing its end. If anything, many will buy contracts at other resorts AND keep the 2042 points. Because, as we all know, the longer you hold your DVC the more valuable it becomes.
The cost of rooms from Disney will continue to increase, the value of staying at a Epcot resort will remain high and grow, and my points chart stays the same. Resale value means nothing if you bought it to vacation at your favorite resort and plan to use it as such for however long you use it. Many ways to view value imo