WAstateDVCDaddy
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
- Messages
- 661
Because they aren't sure if this is a unprovoked or provoked attack? That's what the article at least made it sorta seem like.
That could be part of the criminal question, IDK
It's a question I had and made it not so black and white to me.
While it may just be lip service the USPS is leaving room for this to not be considered an appropriate action the particular mail carrier took.
This was from the spokesperson for the investigating entity (the CDFW):
“The mail carrier apparently had some type of a stick or club and the turkey tried to attack him and he smacked it with the club and killed it,” Foy said.
Additionally he reported that it was known that the turkeys were attacking delivery and mail carriers. So while I understand that they want to investigate if excessive force was used, it seems to me that the assumption should be the mail carrier was defending himself, and without anyone claiming otherwise, that there isn’t a good reason to spend resources investigating.
But I get it. There are undoubtedly people who wouldn’t be happy unless it’s fully ruled out that the poor turkey wasn’t assaulted by a homicidal postal worker!

Last edited: