. . . What is the story on this? . . . It's such an eye sore.
DS and his family arrived today. This is his inlaws first trip to the World. I'm so sorry, they were greeted by that great big, ugly mess. DH and I were discussing, earlier today, how times have changed. There was a time, Disney cared about appearances.. Nowadays, they don't do much to conceal construction or maintenance. Of course, that's a different thread.
Geez, really? A tarp over one very small section of one part of the world that covers hundreds of acres and we're apologizing that it's a big ugly mess?
We expect so much these days.
A picture from that original thread:
![]()
This pretty much goes against the detailing that WDW used to pride themselves on.....
Geez, really? A tarp over one very small section of one part of the world that covers hundreds of acres and we're apologizing that it's a big ugly mess?
We expect so much these days.
That photograph is so atrocious I was absolutely, positively convinced that the picture had been photoshopped. Astonishing... and not in a good way.![]()
That photograph is so atrocious I was absolutely, positively convinced that the picture had been photoshopped. Astonishing... and not in a good way.![]()
1) Now. Now. Now.
2) Let us not be judgmental.
3) If it were painted to match the area
. . . it would cost a couple of thousand dollars
. . . Meg Crofton would charge more admission to everyone
. . . Ogre (I mean Iger) would charge more admission to everyone
. . . compouded, it could be a major ticket price increase
4) So, it is a benefit to all the guests.
NOTE: See, I can "spin" cost savings, or cheapness, just as well as WDW.
![]()
A picture from that original thread:
![]()
This pretty much goes against the detailing that WDW used to pride themselves on.....
Why? because something is being built new behind it and they're willing to wait/deal with it. Isn't this the same thing??