GraceLuvsWDW
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2007
- Messages
- 2,352
GraceLucsWDW,
OK here is where things get really technical.
First we need to determine how compliant they were up to this point.
Did they supply you with a copy of the notice of procedural safeguards when you requested the IEP evaluation? If so have it in front of you, if not they have violated IDEA and we will include that along with any other due process paperwork that needs to be prepared. Yes, they did.
If you have the procedural safeguards manual there is a section on your rights to participate (as an equal member). you are a member of your childs IEP team and have the right to participate in team meeting in identification, evaluation, and educational placement of your child and other matters relating to your childs free and appropriate educations.
OK we first need to find out if the school considered your meeting today to be an evaluation review meeting for the purpose of determining educational classification.
Did you receive a prior written notice of this meeting at least 10 days in advance, No this was an "informal review of test results"or did you sign a waver giving up this right for this meeting. No I did NOTDid the notice state the purpose of the meeting (to review the IDEA evaluation of your child and to make an educational classification determination). No but at this meeting they gave me an "Invitation to Meeting" for a meeting on 10/15/09 which I have NOT signedWere minutes kept of the meeting and were you given a copy for you to review and add corrections and additions. No minutes but I was given a copy of results of testing with no specific testing results cited. She told me she is "asking her lawyers" if she has to give me the specific results which I requested in a formal letter which she received on Friday If any of these did not happen then this was not the review required under the time constraints for the initial evaluation IDEA regulations. It was just a meeting where school personnel were blowing smoke.
Did they give you anything I writing expressing that they had made a decision and what it was Yes, the report they gave me states "XXXX does not appear to meet the criteria for having a disability" under recommendations and assurrances(please tell me they did since that is gross violation of parents rights) if not ask for the items expressed in the meeting to be sent to you in writing including the refusal to send anything but summery reports.I will request her refusal in writing ASAP
As for records, there should be a section in the procedural safeguards manual about this but to paraphrase, for your childs educations records (educational evaluations are part of this) the school must tell you what types of records exist, must allow you to review these records before any meeting including an evaluation meeting, and must supply you copies of the records at reasonable cost (for the copying only) that is affordable to you.Yes, I read this to her verbatim at the meeting but she said that only applies to this summary report and no "all records". She shadily stated those records have other students names on them and therefore, cannot be released. I said to black out the other student names and copy for me and she refused.
As to outside evaluations, diagnosis and recommendations, you need to get copies and bring them to the evaluation meeting. You may also bring clinicians, therapists, or anyone else who is familiar with and can provide input to the process or just to support you. I have just scheduled a meeting with the Neuro-Psych (whose full report the have) and she offered to go over their data and appear at the ARD.
As you know I am direct, but the Autism leader (what ever that is?) has demonstrated that she is incompetent in both Aspergers (not that unusual for someone whose background is in classic autism) and IDEA. I said this to her and she cried in the meeting-REALLY-she cried and stated I was being rude by inferring her best efforts were not put forth.
Other than seeing if you can get her to give in writing what she said during the meeting any further dealing with her are a waste of time outside the formality of an IEP meeting (and hopefully not then).I really agree with you here
Now before you move foreword I need the answers to the above questions.
OK now once I review your answers as I have recommended before it is time to call the director for special education for your district. While there will be some variation depending upon the answers here is the general scenario.
You will ask the SPED director when the formal IEP meeting will be held to review the educational evaluation and to make an educational classification. They want to have it Oct 15th, should I postpone?Then you will bring up the IDEA violation(s) that have occurred and detail them the SPED director. You will ask if the autism leader is a certified Educational diagnostician Her credentials are LSSP, she conceded NO MD was part of the evaluation.and if she has any current training and experience in Aspersers or IDEA She states she is duly "trained" by higher up Special Education Officialssince all indications to date are that she does not. State that if the district director cannot assure future competency I have already found multiple erroneous references in her report!that you want an alternate individual to act as the ED (educational diagnostician) and a person experienced in accurate evaluations and classifications of Aspergers to become part for your childs IEP team. Let her know that you are in the process of drafting multiple due process complaints to request due process hearings which will be sent to the district and the IDEA complaint/compliance official at the State DOE. Let her know that it is not your desire to go through these administrative complexities but blatant disregard for IDEA regulations and the apparent lack of competency of the individual who is acting as the ED are making this necessary unless the process changes immediately.
Let her know that if the evaluations are not accurate, complete and competent that you will be requesting outside second opinion evaluations which under IDEA will be paid for by the district. Let her know that you want a district representative at all meeting to assure compliance and competency.
As I said some answers from above come first then I can provide final direction they it is how you wish to handle it. I will wait to do anything until I hear back from you
As always any help than I can offer is here for the taking.
Here is a link the the federal dept of educations IDEA section which has most of the information I have described above, it is allways effective to email links of the DED DOE website for items which the district is not following to the director of special education.
http://idea.ed.gov/explore/home
bookwormde
I also want to add the report concered a lot of areas of concern. Namely:
Problems with Pragmatic Language (reference to "as seen with Attention Deficit Disorder"
Incorrect Phenome usage/production-inconsistent errors
Articulation Problems
K teacher reports: she becomes distracted by visual stimuli, looks at peers rather than at teacher, spins and flicks objects in front of her eyes, chews and mouths objects, does not keep up with physical activity, fidgety
She had poor tracking in the Visual Motor Test
Observable jump in tracking at midline
Prior school reports: volitional inattention, socially disconnected
Student reports being called names: No teacher corroboration
1st G teacher reports: Chewing excessively, hurt another child by squishing thumb in blocks and appeared "indifferent to prompts to apologize", tongue protrusion when working
When given testing by autism leader: ignored questions, giggled and didn't know appropriate responses, didn't give appropriate response when examiner feigned injury, ignored all questions relating to emotions, Stated she's scared of monsters, Auditory disregard for noises, Difficulty with perspective taking, did not give references when taking about events that the examiners were not familiar with, Sight word reader-does not use appropraite word attack strategies, Said "cat" for copycat and "steps" for stairs
GADS result: High probability for Asperger's (with subnote that said they did not witness those so they determine her not severe enough to constitute Autism)
High level of maladjustment which need to be closely monitored
House Tree Person Test: spun an eloborate story about tree that was given salt water, has ears, and it rains saltwater there everyday. When asked her favorite color she responded "rainbow". Difficulty narrowing choices. In the drawing she scribbled in multicolored circles in a repetitive pattern. HTP results indicate tenseness and high energy, poor impulse control, use of compensatory defenses, feelings of anxiety, and a need for structure.
RCMAS: she told of nightmares which the school interprets as "problems at home". I AM NOT JOKING!
When asked the best thing about herself she said "When I can see my mom"
Report states XXXX embellishes in a result for greater attention, sympathy, and reassurance from her parents.
That's pretty much the highlights.
Please help Bookwormde, thank you for anything you can do to help me!
