Okay --timeout here as I address your points.
Lisa, since we are wondering...why do you care? If it's clear we just aren't going to agree on several key points here, why do you continue to "make points", usually pointing out to the letter EXACTLY what I have done wrong, where I "lose you" or what you would have done differently. Over and over again. You don't seem to want to actually be helpful, just correct. (Not just you, but the same could be said of probably 3-4 others in this thread.)
It is called a discussion board. I am free to discuss as you are. When the majority of folks aren't agreeing with you in full, that is typically a time to self reflect that maybe, just maybe--perspective is needed on your part.
You are right-I am not trying to be helpful--but your incident occurred in November and you did not ask for help. You asked for opinions. I am offering that with my own personal experiences as back drop.
Your condescension that folks aren't reading the thread are silly. We are reading it. It seems you may not be as I get to the next claim of yours...
I mean, granted, I'm defensive at this point, I'll give you that. But this didn't happen to you.
Understandable that you are defendsive especially when posters are providing their own experiences. One has to wonder if you read the thread because your incident did happen to me. Only, I helped myself and got me and my kid to first aid where staff was better equipped to actually ASSIST me, which is what you claim to have expected before going on a lengthy description of lack of compassion.
Oh and there was that explosive puke on the food court.
How did you get through this entire thread and miss where folks shared their experiences of this happening to them and what they did about it?
I had a bad experience, followed up by being attacked on a message board about it for literally every decision I made in the course of the story. But to you, I'm just some rando on a message board.
Nobody "attacked" you. You solicited an opinion and people have them. Just because people do not agree with your observations does not mean it was an attack. If it were, most folks would be overburdened with points and Ossining banned from the boards since "attacks" are not permitted.
The first attack came when you actually told a poster they were worse than the CM. It was uncalled for. The puke incident was 2 months ago, so that type of defensive conduct is not justifiable.
So I'm just wondering...why does it matter so much to you?
Does you incident specifically matter to me? No. Not 2 months later when all has been remedied.
But you posted on a discussion board. I like to discuss. And since you have repeatedly suggested folks weren't reading what you wrote as you failed to actually answer questions--one has to wonder why it matters to you so much to have folks "on your side" and just tell you that you are right and go on about their day. So I have been keeping up on a thread that happens to fascinate me.
ETA: Adding "respectfully" doesn't actually make your responses respectful.
And a vomit event doesn't make you in the right either.
But I did intend my post respectfully. Your posts however seem to be intended otherwise because you don't like other people's opinions.
You have blatently called me selfish (or it was good to make lemons out of lemonade? I'm unclear on that), assumed things I never said, assuming facial expressions when you were never there to see them, You have actually been judgmental and hurtful (though I'm sure I'll be called "oversensitive" for that) without much care. I got a response that you didn't need "admonishment" on a previous post, when I have received little other than that from you.
1. I said it could be argued you leaned selfish. Your posts speak for themselves.
2. Making lemons out of lemonade--this is making the best of a crappy situation and salvaging some positivity. This was me suggesting that if I were I your party what my advice to you would have been. Suck it up and deal with the bad and the move on to make good with the rest. You would be the first person I have ever heard of to be offended by that phrase if you are indeed offended by it.

3. I assumed NOTHING. I said I WONDERED. I.e. If I were a fly on the wall, I would wonder now you came across to all the CMs you encountered. There is no judgement here. It is curious to me how you came across to all these supposed jerky ( in lieu of the profane term you used) CMs you encountered.
You admonished me for not reading your thread correctly. One wonders if you bothered to read if yourself since you seem to cherry pick an awful lot of comments and construe them as attacks and being mean.
You asked an opinion of your situation and I gave one. If you feel that is admonishment, than so be it.
Your demeanor to those who disagree with you is extremely telling. It isn't too much to self reflect that perhaps you are overreacting today over that event 2 months ago.