OurBigTrip
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
- Messages
- 3,462
So this has been quite the interesting (and lively) discussion.
Don't post often so heres a little background:
While not disabled myself I do have inner ear issues which cause demophobia, I can panic in a crowd and have a few times at Disney.
I have never asked for a GAC for this and have been able to tough it out by focusing on my family, although in a few instances my wife has had to ask I stop squeezing her hand or shoulder too hard. We also did not take advantage of GAC the year she was laid up with knee issues and had to be pushed around the park in a wheelchair (but the looks on several cast members faces were quite funny when they offered us access anyways and we declined to go stand in line) its just the way we are, we kinda feel that if its at all possible to not let these things effect how we tour its good for the karma and maybe it'll make it easier in the long haul.
That being said I know there are many for whom that is not an option. I have a niece with ASD a mother with mobility issues and a friend who is legally blind who all need the assistance. We have toured with them in the past and in my experience the GAC is a definate advantage to touring. Each families experience will differ with individual needs and capabilities of course but I definately saw a lot more touring with them than I would have otherwise.
Personally I see the new system as a step up that needs a tweak here and there. It definately seems fair in terms of equal access, and while I'm sure it wont eliminate abuse entirely it should cut it back. At the same time I see why many currently using the GAC would be upset, it does seem like while the ideas behind the system are sound the process may be a little more inconvienient than it needs to be. There is also the issue of dealing with the change period itself which I understand can be very tricky when dealing with kids who likely don't understand why they now have to wait. I've never had a personal experience where I've been truly inconvienieced by repeat riders or numerous GAC users lengthening my wait but I can certainly see where some situations would definately try my patience (the story about 7 times in a row on Dumbo comes to mind). But in general I've had no issues with letting a few families go ahead of us.
Now that I've caught you up on me heres the actual question
Many have been wondering where the compromise is on this issue and I have an idea, I'm sure it would not be the easiest thing to implement but it may be the best way to keep things fair and easier for the effected parties.
What if instead of having to go to the attraction for your wait time minus 15 minutes, you got a return time of the full wait time when you entered your previous attraction. To clarify, you're entering Dumbo at 10am and you would tell the CM at that time (before entering the fp queue) you plan to head to Peter Pan next. The CM looks at a screen and sees Peter Pan currently has a 1/2 hour wait and stamps your passport for 10:30. Your wait is reduced by whatever amount of time it takes you to get through the fp queue and experience the attraction and you no longer have to crisscross back and forth. If you're done Dumbo in 5 minutes you simply take your time getting to Peter Pan.
Does anyone else think this could be the missing aspect of thus new policy to make it all work?
I'll leave it with a quote from Walt himself I think we should all remember in this thread "Happiness is a state of mind. It's just according to the way you look at things."
Mind you no idea if he actually said it I found it on Pinterest, good advice regardless.
I think something like this could absolutely work, but when only one side is actually interested in compromising, it most likely wouldn't even be attempted.