I'm tired of quack TV doctors who think they know more than the FDA or USDA.
Jim
As someone who working in an industry regulated by the FDA, you have no idea how hilarious it is when I hear such generalizations about how the FDA gets led round by the nose by those that it regulates. Yes, the FDA isn't perfect, and yes there are a number of FDA staffers that used to work in regulated industries... but that's because that's where the expertise is (perhaps you'd prefer that civil engineers oversee things?).I am all for science, and don't watch TV doctors, but when a couple of corporations control so much of the food supply, and many of the former "elite" from those corporations control the FDA and figure so prominently in government offices, it makes me a little nervous. The movement, the backlash, is against control of our food supply, not against science.
Now your questioning my diagnosis?? What kind of person ARE YOU???? TROLL!!! LOOK IT UP ON WIKI!!!There is a pre-cancerious skin condition that is considered a STAGE 0....it's the stage RIGHT BEFORE CANCER. HOW PATHETIC of you to question that. AND honestly I thought wikipedia was a good source for information. IS it a RULE that I post my sources. I don't owe you JACK. I'm sorry your upset you don't agree with what I believe in....but you don't have to attack me and call me a liar ....which is basically what you did.
![]()
As someone who working in an industry regulated by the FDA, you have no idea how hilarious it is when I hear such generalizations about how the FDA gets led round by the nose by those that it regulates. Yes, the FDA isn't perfect, and yes there are a number of FDA staffers that used to work in regulated industries... but that's because that's where the expertise is (perhaps you'd prefer that civil engineers oversee things?).
To me it's mostly about a lack of scientific understanding than it is a "backlash" against it.
You're blurring a couple of issues here. You can certainly argue that there aren't enough FDA/USDA inspectors in the field, but what do "financial restraints" have to do with the regulated industries?Then why does the UCS find when it surveys FDA employees, many feel they cannot do their jobs properly because of industry and financial restraints?.
It may not, but other countries don't have the same laws we do. I know Chilean grapes are suppose to be one of the worst as far as pesticide residue.
How many years of medical school and experience do you think he has? Just b/c you specialize in a certain field of medicine, does not make you ignorant of other medical issues.These doctors have to train in ALL aspects of medicine before they even graduate from medical school.... I know.... I grew up in a family full of doctors. Besides, not everybody is one dimensional. Just saying.....
AND I am not saying he knows EVERYTHING... I have read tons of reports about what the FDA has done and NOT done. It's sad really.... innocent people getting sick for no reason but allowing these companies to get rich. In the end, it's all about the $$$. When it compromises the health of others, that's when I get upset.
That's sensationalizing though - as arsenic is in apple juice because arsenic is in apples, all apples, and always has been. So what was his point besides fearmongering?This is how I feel. I know that Dr. Oz may try and sensationalize his show, but he was clear about saying that this juice isn't going to kill your kids. He simply said we should know what is in our food and where it comes from.
That's sensationalizing though - as arsenic is in apple juice because arsenic is in apples, all apples, and always has been. So what was his point besides fearmongering?
What's next? Peaches can kill you because they contain cyanide - because he cares and just wants you to know what's in your food?
In China apples are allowed to be sprayed with arsenic laced pesticide. The apples are then ground up and the pesticide with the arsenic is in the Apple Juice Concentrate. That was what he was referring to....and I think that is a legitimate concern, not just with apples but with any foods coming from a country with different standards than the US. If we can't do something with our food supply here, why should we be allowed to import a food from another country that doesn't adhere to US standards?