Armanda Knox guilty---- again

[PaulaSB12]

I just can't with this thread anymore, I can't handle the bias and lack of objectivity. Thank God for posters like Dinolounger and Sunshine Highway whose thoughtful and reasonable statements aren't distorted by a blind devotion to the stars and stripes.

Hang on a minute I don't have any devotion to the stars and stripes. My loyalty is to the union jack. By your logic the fact that the victim is british should make me more partial to believe her guilt not innocence I have read the evidence and have never believed either Amanda or her boyfriend was guilty not because she is american but because she didn't do it.

 

[TLSnell1981]

You're entitled to it, but per my last post, an acquittal does not inarguably prove innocence.

And as time goes on Knox will really begin to understand that (yes, the pale but perpetual cloud of doubt......)

Possibly, if she lived abroad, but she doesn't. I seriously doubt, there will be long reaching affects

 

[nugov2]

Possibly, if she lived abroad, but she doesn't. I seriously doubt, there will be long reaching affects

I agree. She hasn't been harassed while she had a verdict hanging over her head and now that she has been exonerated I'd imagine that would be even less. If she decides to stay out of the public eye she will live as normal of a life as anyone, aside from mental trauma. I'd imagine she has no immediate plans to travel out of the country and if she does years from now it will be a non issue because of the amount of time that has passed.

 

[nugov2]

Looks like the cloud of doubt surrounding Amanda is becoming even thinner. While I think it probably didn't matter much to her, I'm sure it is a huge relief to have this even further behind her. This sounds like the final blow to this case.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...nda-knox-conviction-based-poor-case/71844786/

This is just one of the articles I read. One stated that they left the kitchen knife, the supposed murder weapon in a simple cardboard box in evidence. That is just ridiculous!

 

[EMom]

My belief that she and her ex BF should have spent no time in prison has less to do with the stars and stripes than with DNA evidence.

 

[low-key]

wow Foxy Knoxy didnt do it

 

[usnuzuloose]

I guess she can finally put all this behind her and move on.

 

[PaulaSB12]

Here is the translation of the motivation report on the aquital

http://www.amandaknoxcase.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Marasca-Bruno-Motivations-Report.pdf
t go beyond a conclusion of “probable identity” to one of certainty (ff. 260/1). 9.4.3. It can easily be observed that the conclusion that there was a lack of an evidentiary framework consistent and sufficient to support the prosecution’s hypothesis regarding the more serious case of murder certainly reverberates on the residual, secondary accusations, listed here, d) theft of mobile phones and e) simulation of a crime. 10. The intrinsic contradictory nature of the evidence, emerging from the text of the appealed verdict, in essence undermines the connective tissue of the same, leading to its annulment. In fact, in the presence of a scenario marked by many contradictions, the referral judge should not have come to a verdict of guilt, but - as previously Marasca-Bruno Motivations Report v1.2 24 September 2015 http://www.amandaknoxcase.com/ http://www.injusticeanywhere.org/ Page 54 observed – should have reached a verdict of not guilty, given Article 530, section 2, Italian Code of Criminal Procedure. At this point only one matter remains to be resolved, regarding the type of annulment - i.e., whether it should be decided with or without a new trial - which depends, obviously, on the objective possibility of further investigation which could unravel the perplexing aspects, and offer answers of certainty, perhaps through new technical investigations. The answer is certainly negative. In fact the biological traces on items of investigative interest are of minuscule magnitude, and as such, incompatible with amplification and, thus, destined not to give reliable, certain answers, whether in terms of identity or in terms of compatibility. The computers of Amanda Knox and Kercher, which might have been useful to the investigation, were, incredibly, burned by the careless actions of the investigators, causing a short circuit due probably to an erroneous power supply; and they cannot give any more information, given that the damage is irreversible. The panorama of the declared evidence is complete, given the accuracy and completeness of the evidentiary trial hearing, which occurred in both appeal trials. Guede, a certain co-participant in the murder, has always refused to collaborate and, for reasons already given, cannot be forced to take the stand. The technical assessments requested by the defence cannot be guaranteed to clarify matters, not only due to the time that has passed, but also because they relate to aspects that are difficult to verify (such as the possibility of selective cleaning) or of obvious irrelevancy (IT examination of Sollecito’s computer), given the possibility for him, no matter how long the interaction was (even if the interaction was definitely his), to reach Kercher’s house, or they are obviously superfluous, given the thoroughness of the impeccable technical investigations performed (e.g. the inspection of the body and subsequent forensic pathology tests). Given the above-mentioned considerations, it is evident that a new trial would be useless, thus the verdict of annulment without a new trial, in accordance with Article 620 letter I) of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure, thus applying a sentence of not guilty which would also have been reached by any new referral judge, in accordance with the principles of law set out in this judgment. The annulment of Knox’s conviction with regards to crime A), excludes the aggravating circumstance of criminal intent as per Article, 61 n. 2 of the Italian Penal Code. The exclusion of this part means the sentence must be redetermined, which is quantified to the same degree as fixed by the Perugia Court of Appeal, the Marasca-Bruno Motivations Report v1.2 24 September 2015 http://www.amandaknoxcase.com/ http://www.injusticeanywhere.org/ Page 55 adequacy of which has been amply justified, on the basis of determining parameters with which this judgment completely agrees. It is hardly necessary to add that the result of the judgment precludes consideration of any other defence plea, deduction or request as absorbed or implicitly rejected, while any other line of argument, among those not examined, are considered inadmissible as, clearly, it would enter into the merits of the judgment. 11. Given the above, it can only be decided [to proceed] as per the operative part of this judgment. FOR THESE REASONS Pursuant to Article 620 letter A) Italian Code of Criminal Procedure; annuls the ruling under appeal with respect to the crime under charge B) of the rubric because the crime is extinct due to statute of limitations; pursuant to Articles 620 letter L) and 530, section 2 Italian Code of Criminal Procedure; excluding the aggravating circumstance under Italian under Article 61 n. 2 Penal Code, in relation to the crime of calumny, annuls the ruling under appeal without referral with respect to the crimes under charges A), D) and E) of the rubric because the appellants did not commit the act. Recalculates the sentence imposed upon appellant Amanda Maria Knox for the crime of calumny in three years of confinement.

 

[Art 1]

wow Foxy Knoxy didnt do it

Yea, her and OJ. Maybe she can hang out with him at the golf course while trying to find the real killers.

 

[ols386]

Her nick name Foxy Knoxy came from her soccer days. I read that she was a good player, and that's when her team mates gave her that name.

FTR, I never did believe she was guilty.

 

[asta]

Yea, her and OJ. Maybe she can hang out with him at the golf course while trying to find the real killers.

Knox can't hang out with OJ on a golf course because she is free and innocent while OJ is sitting in prison for a long time.

Actually these two incidents are polar opposites. Knox was initially convicted with very little proof and later found innocent. OJ was initially found not guilty despite the physical evidence with a defense that capitalized on racial prejudice. Later civil case and public opinion have decided he was the murderer.