Same. That doesn't seem right though...Wow for our city - with our combined income, we are above middle class. I never would have thought that.
I don't think it really seems right either - DH and I are a police officer and teacher - we definitely aren't living an "Upper Class" life.Same. That doesn't seem right though...
The numbers are merely XX% to XX% around the middle, hence "middle" class. The fact that you have a kid in school or you pay childcare vs. the Miller's have grandma watch the kids, etc, that all comes out after the factor of where your income is in the chart.Those are absurdly low numbers which may appease the pride of hard working people but net take home is a fraction of that. If you dig in further with taxes, childcare, healthcare payments + copay + deductibles for those non-Cadillac plans normal people get, commute expenses & the whims of officials with pricing you are drowning nevermind if you have a child in college. The ranges are delusional, the people who came up with these numbers must be on something and it must be the same something the people who do the numbers for living expenses for Social Security take.
More interesting is the question, what does it mean to be middle class?
Don't work for the government then. Anyone can look up my exact salary & benefits.
I do understand you completely but we are seeing two different things in play and from different points of view. I think the people making this chart & defining "XX% to XX%" thresholds to poverty are setting the bar extremely low and defining middle as anyone who isn't homeless because of optics. Goal is they want to be able to use the word middle easily and redefining what middle is, well that is much easier than fixing things and getting struggling people up to the bar, or so I suspect.The numbers are merely XX% to XX% around the middle, hence "middle" class. The fact that you have a kid in school or you pay childcare vs. the Miller's have grandma watch the kids, etc, that all comes out after the factor of where your income is in the chart.
For all those stating that you are at the upper end/just above middle class but it doesn't "feel like it", I'm curious to know why you feel that way. Do you not feel upper middle class because you are struggling to make ends meet despite your income or is it simply because you aren't doing all the things that you see other people who you think are "upper class" doing?
People have drastically different lifestyles regardless of their income, so it's very hard to gauge what another family's income actually is unless they tell you. I think sometimes when things are common in your area, you tend to assume that's what all "middle class" people have/do.
For example, in our area it is "the norm" to have your kids involved in many expensive extracurricular activities, get coffee daily, go out to eat many times a week, have professional family photos taken a few times a year, gym membership, etc. I, personally, do not feel comfortable with that level of spending even though we could afford it, so we have simply chosen to opt out of "keeping up with the Joneses". Despite the fact that our income has more than doubled over the last few years, we live the same lifestyle we always have (actually we downsized our house a few years ago when I started a higher paying job). We definitely appear to others and "feel" like we are living within the lower end of "middle class", despite the fact that our income well exceeds the upper limit on the chart for our area.
I agree. To compound it, most people and media when they talk "middle class" they inflate the other way. People with dual incomes each making $100k+ media defines as middle class.I do understand you completely but we are seeing two different things in play and from different points of view. I think the people making this chart & defining "XX% to XX%" thresholds to poverty are setting the bar extremely low and defining middle as anyone who isn't homeless because of optics. Goal is they want to be able to use the word middle easily and redefining what middle is, well that is much easier than fixing things and getting struggling people up to the bar, or so I suspect.
Middle class is more of a lifestyle than a number & the people who package numbers are attempting to quantify quality of life, and failing BTW. It is dangerous for us, as a society, to allow people who are struggling to be labeled as fine with words like Middle Class. There are giant swaths of the US who meet the numbers for middle but are not fine and can't meet the expenses for a decent life with the absurd numbers used. The numbers are just wrong & we would all see that if actual budgets of real people were ever part of the conversation instead of graphs thrown together by some plutocrat with a schmancy degree.
To me this is spin & I am no fan of spin.