I don't believe I ever mentioned anything about Universal. And as a grown woman don't think for a minute that I ever expect life to be fair. I'm well aware of that at this point. Especially when I post an opinion, as unpopular as it may be, in a polite and respectful manner and get condescending responses.

Right but you are comparing $100-150 per night to $400+ So the person is paying for those extra amenities, but the onsite perks are the same.
Life's not fair and make more money... I guess I can't argue with that.No one ever propped me up on their knee when I was little and told me life would be fair.
If anyone was told that life would be fair, they were lied to........
In fact I've learned that if life were fair and equal no one would ever try to achieve anything.
Why bother if someone's going to even things out for you?
The desire to better oneself is the driving force behind all of mankind's accomplishments.
Without adversity, and challenge, there is NO progress......
So think of Disney's perks for spending more money on their property as an incentive to make more money in order to advance your goals in life.![]()

Agree! Universal's onsite perks are better than Disney's onsite perks. But Disney is better if you are offsite (at least you get 3 prebooked FPs)
This is good to know. Thanks for the input.I have to say this is something that I appreciate about Disney and prt of what has us skipping US for the first time in 10 trips(LA and Orlando) is that while there is on site perks I don't think they go so far as to not be worthwhile visiting without them, once you arrive at the park you are not second class like you at at US

Until FP+ this wasn't a perk for onsite only guests. Anyone with a ticket could get FP-; --indeed aren't there multiple threads about the dreaded "up at midnight or whole vacation ruined if I don't get my FP+ at exactly the right time for exactly the right attraction" scenarios?? Personally I don't think FP+ should have such a wide difference in schedule. Maybe, someday, if Disney ever gets around to it and builds MORE RIDES than resort guests can book 4 or 5, while offsite limited to 3 at a time-but all at same window. It really wouldn't be such an issue if there were more E-ticket rides. And then extend EMH to include more hours and parks.
Hi. I didn't mention EMH because I guess they seem like an added bonus for resort guest but don't really put other guests at a disadvantage either.
So hard (for me) to respond to this question without making a political sounding comment. So, I guess I'll run along. But, I won't run too fast.
I haven't read the other responses completely but I'll give you my thoughts anyway. I do agree with you.I hope this isn't a controversial topic as I don't mean it to be. I'd just like to hear other's opinions on the subject. And I haven't seen a topic like this posted recently but I apologize if it's been covered in the past.
I'm planning my family's first ever trip to Disney next year. Thanks to a lot of research and the great people on this message board, I feel like I'm in a really good place to plan a great trip for my family. One thing that has confused me in my research though, is some of the park perks that onsite people get over people staying offsite. I decided pretty early on that an offsite resort would work better for my family and that meant giving up some perks that I didn't feel were necessarily fair. The two that I'm referring to most are the advantage of booking early ADRs and FPs.
It's just my opinion that anything having to do with attractions or dining inside the parks should be a level playing field for all ticket holders, regardless of your choice of lodging. I understand that the onsite perks are to encourage people to stay on Disney property but if I pay the same ticket price as an onsite person, shouldn't I have the same opportunity to book FP and park ADRs? I know I'm giving up part of the Disney experience by staying offsite and that's a choice I've made but now I'm also at a disadvantage for a system that Disney has made necessary as a part of the planning process.
I know my concerns won't change the way things are done and that's fine. I just want to hear opinions from other offsite people as well as onsite guests. And again, I don't want my post to ruffle any feathers. No matter where we stay, I'm planning for wonderful time.![]()
I don't see this as being any more fair....
People stayed onsite long before there were fastpass perks. Maybe if the prices weren't so high...If you want the perks of stating onsite, stay onsite. If you want the perks of staying offsite, stay offsite.
You can stay offsite in an entire house (with multiple bedrooms and bathrooms, a full kitchen, and a private laundry) for less than the cost of a tiny onsite value room. If there weren't perks for onsite guests, why would anyone stay onsite?
Offsite guests get way more "perks" than being offsite at Universal. I would never go to Universal without staying onsite.
Did you know that there are actually nice resorts in clean areas outside of the Disney complex? Wow.I will. Stay onsite. It's better than watching the people at the Metro stop waiting to get on the city bus across from your motel throw cigarette butts on the ground or watch the sandwich board guy on the corner hawking sea world discounts. When you stay on site at Disney you get a clean, professional, magically enclosed world where the ravages of the real world depravation are absent. That's what I pay for and the price is more than fair.
If I wanted to see the dirty gas stations and trash strewn streets on my drive to the Disney parks I'd stay off site. Ok then, Carry on.
