- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
- Messages
- 45,330
Of course, there are regular owners getting rooms too. But go look on Rental Sites and you'll see sooo many standard rooms being offered at a tidy profit, it's clear these are not being rented in volume by the DVC members for their own use. DVC is perfectly capable of limiting rentals to owners "first" (that is what the entire 11 month priority is supposed to accomplish - and it fails in many cases). They could limit reservations at the 11 month mark to only people checking in with a "listed owner" as a checkin guest. Owners could even choose to add a few people to that "primary" list each year - much like the Associates linked to accounts. The capacity to do that already exists.
I'm not opposed to renting points (it is allowed by the DVC documents), but there ARE owners of thousands upon thousands of points (with so many loopholes! so no true limits) who literally make their living (commercial use) by grabbing prime rooms and re-renting them. DVC won't fix it unless it affects "Disney's" bottom line since they actually seem to care little about DVC members once they close on their Direct points. My two cents worth.
(Wyndham actually stepped in recently - see the Bonnet Creek threads - to cut down on their Commercial Use. We are researching Wyndham points as a very inexpensive alternative to DVC for that very reason).
No one owner can be part of more than 8000 points total amongst all the resorts so there is a limit. Also, the. POS specifically defines that owners, guests, and even renters fall under personal use, and is allowed
There is no legal way for them to add language now that that does not apply for an 11 month booking because then they would be defining renting for commercial purposes as rentals in the names of others at 11 months as that.
And, as long as the owner is on a reservation at 11 months, it’s would then not a violation…they simply add the other guests later….but, we can open a new thread to Continue this if you want!