mmausse
"Amid a burst of lightning, I'll show up in a flas
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2002
- Messages
- 368
Attention all architectural, building, historical, and decorating guru's:
I have a 30-yo Cape Cod home - white with black shutters, modelled after "Chowning's Tavern" in Historical Williamsburg, VA. It has 6 dormer windows and it has bead-board siding that is made of Masonite - 7 inch boards with 1 inch coping under each. My house is solidly constructed except that the people I bought it from did not take care of the Masonite siding and it has feathered or peeled away. Painting is not an option because of the damage to the Masonite. You can't sand Masonite like wood. So my options are to side it:
a) Vinyl is no longer an option - it is seamed and due to the southern exposure the front gets, none of the estimators would offer a warranty beyond 10 years. Plus, it doesn't look the same as the historical version. Strong winds make it wave at you too. No rigidity.
b) Aluminum siding with a vinyl face is prohibitively expensive though it does provide the rigidity and no seams. But it dents.
c) Brick over the Masonite - also terribly expensive. Unless I choose a brick veneer made of concrete.
d) Put a stone veneer over the Masonite. Now I have looked into this and it can be done for the same price as the vinyl, BUT my family is saying it will look terrible on a Cape-Cod home. I love the stone houses that I see in the historical sections of my town and neighboring towns.
MY question to all you "buffs" out there - will a stone-faced Cape-Cod still be historically and esthetically proper/correct?
I have a 30-yo Cape Cod home - white with black shutters, modelled after "Chowning's Tavern" in Historical Williamsburg, VA. It has 6 dormer windows and it has bead-board siding that is made of Masonite - 7 inch boards with 1 inch coping under each. My house is solidly constructed except that the people I bought it from did not take care of the Masonite siding and it has feathered or peeled away. Painting is not an option because of the damage to the Masonite. You can't sand Masonite like wood. So my options are to side it:
a) Vinyl is no longer an option - it is seamed and due to the southern exposure the front gets, none of the estimators would offer a warranty beyond 10 years. Plus, it doesn't look the same as the historical version. Strong winds make it wave at you too. No rigidity.
b) Aluminum siding with a vinyl face is prohibitively expensive though it does provide the rigidity and no seams. But it dents.
c) Brick over the Masonite - also terribly expensive. Unless I choose a brick veneer made of concrete.
d) Put a stone veneer over the Masonite. Now I have looked into this and it can be done for the same price as the vinyl, BUT my family is saying it will look terrible on a Cape-Cod home. I love the stone houses that I see in the historical sections of my town and neighboring towns.
MY question to all you "buffs" out there - will a stone-faced Cape-Cod still be historically and esthetically proper/correct?