HyperspaceMountainPilot
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2019
- Messages
- 3,654
I’ve read enough of your posts not to assume you were advocating for dishonesty— I interpreted it as you genuinely trying to help someone you assumed needed better/higher accommodations than they were getting— and while I don’t think kind people like you should be getting hostility, blame or judgment— I suspect it upsets others (especially some of us who are more cynical about human nature) when trusting members of the disability community offer help to randos on the internet so they can get additional accommodations (that place extra strain on the system) who may not truly need them. In this case, we had a poster who said they often visit the parks alone and then you offered language suggesting they tell a CM that their cousin is actually an attendant to help manage their anxiety. While one additional person in AQR might not impact the operation of that ride, it might also have meant that the poster and his cousin would go ride other attractions together while the other members of their group waited out the long lines.Perhaps I did. I err on making sure a person with disabilities truly has had their situation assessed. Too often disabled folk are marginalized without knowing what they should be asking for.
Also perhaps you've misread mine poste and intent to advocate, not intend for dishonesty.
Disney made a call that most conditions (including that poster’s) didn’t qualify for DAS or DAS-lite, and the poster him/herself seems to recognize that AQR worked in their case, it just didn’t let them ride as many rides as they would have liked and stay together with the cousin.