Anyone Want to Discuss Minivans (& SUVs) with me?

It did. We bought a '12 Odyssey new, at 34,000 miles it started sputtering and wouldn't go. Took it in and they're like "yeah, we know what it is." They replaced 3 pistons, not all six just 3. Also didn't hone and sleeve the cylinder wall (refinish the cylinder wall). This struck me as bizarre and honestly half***. So I traded it off. But I looked into it and they had settled a class action suit for this veritable cylinder management. It caused early wear and they were being overwhelmed with repairs. Their were 8 other odysseys in for the same thing at the dealership with ours.
EVERY made has lemons, and things just happen. A coworker loved her Honda until Tuesday morning when the head gasket blew at 215 am on the way to work. Time for a new car, and one bad experience means it won't be a Honda.
 
A few things here. The Odyssey (along with the Accord, with which it shares the V6 motor), had some minor issues with variable cylinder management (VCM). The issue has been corrected with the 2013+ models (change of generation) and the old issue was a bit overblown. Honda also had some issues with their automatic transmissions, but that was YEARS ago, a solid decade now or more. Honda outsourced some of the transmission components, I believe it was to a company called Aisin. They didn't all fail, but they had an un-Honda like failure rate, so they got a bad reputation. However, I think that issue was solved in the mid-2000s. No such issues on any newer ones. The Hondas, Toyotas and Kias are still the class of the field when it comes to reliability.

Sure, you can ask a transmission shop about transmissions, but that's selling yourself short. They'll know about one component of a much larger picture. Transmissions now are more tough then ever, and many of them are no longer serviceable from a repair standpoint. If they break, you throw it out and get another one. Not like the old days where rebuilding was the common route. Some CVTs have had reliability issues...I don't like them because they sap power, sap feeling and cause the engine to drone and whine. The one "good" thing about them is that they have so few parts. Once they get a better handle on making those few parts it has more reliable, they should be tough as nails and cheap. I still prefer my good ol' fashion stick shift, but that's me.
 
EVERY made has lemons, and things just happen. A coworker loved her Honda until Tuesday morning when the head gasket blew at 215 am on the way to work. Time for a new car, and one bad experience means it won't be a Honda.
My "one bad experience" just so happened to be while driving my wife who was 39weeks pregnant to the hospital, our son was born the next day. So a screaming pregnant wife swearing at me that she will not own another Honda sunk in.
 
Know folks who had a Pacifica and it had lots of issues.

How much are new Sienna minivans and new Odyssey minivans?
I've never looked at Sienna's, but a brand new Odyssey is around $40,000 with some bells and whistles. I believe you can get the most basic one for about $32,000.
 

My "one bad experience" just so happened to be while driving my wife who was 39weeks pregnant to the hospital, our son was born the next day. So a screaming pregnant wife swearing at me that she will not own another Honda sunk in.

OK, so you had bad timing. Where would you go from there? Unless you buy a Toyota or maybe Hyundai/Kia, anything else is a step down in reliability, or more. Even the best cars break, they're machines.
 
Great advice. I had a transmission replaced in my wife's 2000 Mountaineer and I asked the transmission shop owner which brand of car, if any, had the most transmission issues. Hands down, Nissans with the CVT. So bad he said, that the family that owned the local Nissan dealership sold it because of the lawsuits they got snarled in over those transmissions, and angry customers. But, the other brands they sell, Honda, Mazda, Subaru, Toyota and even Chevrolet, they hung on to.

I would stay away from a Nissan with a cvt. I purchased the first year of the Nissan Pathfinder with the new cvt. I needed 3 cvts before the vehicle had 9,000 miles on it. I eventually made Nissan repurchase it thru the Georgia lemon law, but it was a huge fight. Nissan made me prove that their vehicle was defective, which was nearly impossible to do even though the defect was widely known. It was a hugely stressful experience.
 
Everyone swears by Honda but that just isn't our experience. My parents had a Honda car they bought new years back that was nothing but trouble; radio quite, wouldn't shift, steering trouble, All before 100,000 miles. I have an aunt that couldn't keep brakes on her civic, new pads every 5,000 miles, and rotors twice in 10,000. I have other family and friends that have had similar bad experiences, maybe were the exception. If people have good luck with them, great but their just not for us. We've had great luck with chevy, my wife and I bought a new 16 Subaru Outback and really like it so far and hopefully it'll treat us better.
 
Everyone swears by Honda but that just isn't our experience. My parents had a Honda car they bought new years back that was nothing but trouble; radio quite, wouldn't shift, steering trouble, All before 100,000 miles. I have an aunt that couldn't keep brakes on her civic, new pads every 5,000 miles, and rotors twice in 10,000. I have other family and friends that have had similar bad experiences, maybe were the exception. If people have good luck with them, great but their just not for us. We've had great luck with chevy, my wife and I bought a new 16 Subaru Outback and really like it so far and hopefully it'll treat us better.

My wife bought one years ago and we still have it. It's been rock solid dependable, even with somewhat neglected maintenance. The only thing it's ever needed was new brake pads.
 
So... in reading here and our own experiences over the years, I think whatever car we buy it will be a Toyota. We have had three and not an issue with any. We or our close family have had issues with most other brands.
 
DH has long been interested in the Honda Odyssey - primarily because of the reputation & reliability & longevity. (We drive vehicles until they're "done.") However, neither one of us likes the look of the Odyssey. He thinks it looks rather hearse-like. I don't like how you can see the track of the sliding doors on both sides.

Additionally, I think (& this is just my opinion), because the Odyssey has been the #1 selling minivan for so many years, Honda has stopped caring about the design & has just been relying on their reputation.

I can only comment on the Honda. I just traded my 2001 Honda Odyssey in this fall with 207,000 miles on it. It was still running fine. The body was the concern, not the inner workings at that point-just like many old people-the body fails before the mind. We had that van for 14 years-that's a long, long time. I raised my 4 kids in that van. I would def recommend the Odyssey to anyone. We didn't need a van any more so we got a Subaru Forester, ds17 rear ended someone with it and it took Subaru 2 months to get the parts to our shop so I've been driving a rental for 2 months. Just got my car back today. I really love it.
 
I'm sure I'm repeating here, so apologies! SIL bought a new Town & Country and really liked it. She unfortunately totaled it within 2 weeks of owning it. So they got a Chrysler Pacifica after that and they LOVE it. They like it much more than the Town & Country, and it works well for their family - they have a 5 year old and 3 year old. My boss at work is on his second Honda Odyssey and I know he swears by them.

As far as SUVs, a friend at work has the Ford Explorer with third row seating and finds the third row to be useless. It's a smaller row than a minivan would have, especially for head space so it's hard for people to climb back there. It also takes up the cargo/trunk space in the back, so she often needs to fold the seat down. The middle row are bucket seats with no optional middle section to pull down, so no one can sit in the middle. And her bucket seats have car seats in them for her kids, so if she needs to drive more than one other person, the third person has to crawl into the third row.
 
Sounds very familiar :) Hit a deer with my beloved 2008 Dodge Caravan and totaled it. We probably had taken 20 trips to Disney from Baltimore, MD and I knew no other car would be as comfortable. However, we decided to get a 2014 Honda Pilot and our first trip in the Honda to Disney was awesome. 3 row seating, lots of room and not too bad on gas. Love it!
 
We test drove the Range Rover Discovery and LOVED the look of it. However the maintenance and customer complaints against it was too much to overcome. We test drove a Lexus RX350 and research says that it has some of the best reviews and maintenance. We just have to call around to see what's the best price.
 
We test drove the Range Rover Discovery and LOVED the look of it. However the maintenance and customer complaints against it was too much to overcome. We test drove a Lexus RX350 and research says that it has some of the best reviews and maintenance. We just have to call around to see what's the best price.

You mean Land Rover?

A former coworker had a permanent home near Lake Tahoe but came into the San Francisco Bay Area to work. He'd go back maybe once every few weeks. He was British and of course had a Land Rover Discovery. He preferred to come via his motorcycle because the Land Rover was an absolute fuel hog from 4WD and the big V-8. I guess the new owner wanted a smaller engine in the current versions.

He said he really wanted a Defender with a spare tire on the hood.
 
Yes, Land Rover. My secretary also said her sister had one and the first few months of ownership it was in and out of the dealership for repairs for about a month.
 
Yes, Land Rover. My secretary also said her sister had one and the first few months of ownership it was in and out of the dealership for repairs for about a month.

Well, the problem for my former coworker in the winter was that the motorcycle wasn't ideal for winter, so he ended up taking the Land Rover. It was great in snow and ice. I think manual transmission too, which may not be an option now? He said he would put up requests on Craigslist for people who needed a ride and might pay for half his fuel cost.

I don't think Land Rover has ever been known for having excellent daily reliability. They were originally capable off-road vehicles that were easy to do field repairs on. Not sure Indian ownership has helped with that.
 
You mean Land Rover?

A former coworker had a permanent home near Lake Tahoe but came into the San Francisco Bay Area to work. He'd go back maybe once every few weeks. He was British and of course had a Land Rover Discovery. He preferred to come via his motorcycle because the Land Rover was an absolute fuel hog from 4WD and the big V-8. I guess the new owner wanted a smaller engine in the current versions.

He said he really wanted a Defender with a spare tire on the hood.

LOL. The V-8 was 4.6 liters. About as small a V-8 as you can get. My Suburban has a 7.4. That is a big V-8.
Pretty tempermental vehicles. There is a British car repair place 3 doors down from my mechanic. They must be pretty good because issues the Land Rover dealer can't fix, they sublet to this shop. Lots of Rolls Royces there too.
 
We bought a 2016 Odyssey last year and I love it! It handles well, it's user friendly (I hated the stow and go seats in the grand Carvan we had), and it held up well in a recent accident.

We have a Sedona rental due to that accident and it is sweet! It is super sporty and the interior feels more high end than our Odyssey. But they cost as much as an Odyssey and they still don't hold their value in our area.

We've had two Grand Caravans and I hated them both. The new Pacifica still doesn't appeal to me.
 
If you buy Toyota or Honda (my vote is on the sienna--I LOVE mine) you won't be babying it at 98,000 miles to make it last. You'll start that at like 175,000-200,000. I'm at 173,000 and going strong.
Friend of mine finally turned over her odyssey at 225,000 miles and it was mechanically perfectly fine. Just needed some air conditioner work.

I've never felt so comfortable driving a car so long. Drove it on a 6 hr trip today with no husband and didn't bat an eye. Reliability is awesome!

I'm leaning toward the Sienna over the Odyssey as well - However, at this point, the one major "sticking point" for me is that the Honda scores higher on the crash test ratings.

Know folks who had a Pacifica and it had lots of issues.

How much are new Sienna minivans and new Odyssey minivans?

Was it one of the new Pacificas? Because the Pacifica has been completely redesigned.

Have you considered a Ford Flex? I got mine a few months ago and LOVE it.

I'm actually a die-hard Chevy girl, & my grandfather would roll over in his grave if I bought a Ford. LOL!

It did. We bought a '12 Odyssey new, at 34,000 miles it started sputtering and wouldn't go. Took it in and they're like "yeah, we know what it is." They replaced 3 pistons, not all six just 3. Also didn't hone and sleeve the cylinder wall (refinish the cylinder wall). This struck me as bizarre and honestly half***. So I traded it off. But I looked into it and they had settled a class action suit for this veritable cylinder management. It caused early wear and they were being overwhelmed with repairs. Their were 8 other odysseys in for the same thing at the dealership with ours.

Hmm... that's interesting....

A few things here. The Odyssey (along with the Accord, with which it shares the V6 motor), had some minor issues with variable cylinder management (VCM). The issue has been corrected with the 2013+ models (change of generation) and the old issue was a bit overblown. Honda also had some issues with their automatic transmissions, but that was YEARS ago, a solid decade now or more. Honda outsourced some of the transmission components, I believe it was to a company called Aisin. They didn't all fail, but they had an un-Honda like failure rate, so they got a bad reputation. However, I think that issue was solved in the mid-2000s. No such issues on any newer ones. The Hondas, Toyotas and Kias are still the class of the field when it comes to reliability.

Sure, you can ask a transmission shop about transmissions, but that's selling yourself short. They'll know about one component of a much larger picture. Transmissions now are more tough then ever, and many of them are no longer serviceable from a repair standpoint. If they break, you throw it out and get another one. Not like the old days where rebuilding was the common route. Some CVTs have had reliability issues...I don't like them because they sap power, sap feeling and cause the engine to drone and whine. The one "good" thing about them is that they have so few parts. Once they get a better handle on making those few parts it has more reliable, they should be tough as nails and cheap. I still prefer my good ol' fashion stick shift, but that's me.

And it's also interesting to me that you put in the Kia up there w/ the Honda & Toyota.

Everyone swears by Honda but that just isn't our experience. My parents had a Honda car they bought new years back that was nothing but trouble; radio quite, wouldn't shift, steering trouble, All before 100,000 miles. I have an aunt that couldn't keep brakes on her civic, new pads every 5,000 miles, and rotors twice in 10,000. I have other family and friends that have had similar bad experiences, maybe were the exception. If people have good luck with them, great but their just not for us. We've had great luck with chevy, my wife and I bought a new 16 Subaru Outback and really like it so far and hopefully it'll treat us better.

Again, my sister has not had a good experience w/ her Odyssey either.

My mom is pretty much a Chevrolet-only person - she's the daughter of a Chevy man (my grandfather). She & my Dad have had a Chevrolet minivan for years, & she wants to trade it in for a Traverse. (I've told her she needs something smaller.)

So... in reading here and our own experiences over the years, I think whatever car we buy it will be a Toyota. We have had three and not an issue with any. We or our close family have had issues with most other brands.

That's kinda what I'm reading too...

I'm sure I'm repeating here, so apologies! SIL bought a new Town & Country and really liked it. She unfortunately totaled it within 2 weeks of owning it. So they got a Chrysler Pacifica after that and they LOVE it. They like it much more than the Town & Country, and it works well for their family - they have a 5 year old and 3 year old. My boss at work is on his second Honda Odyssey and I know he swears by them.

As far as SUVs, a friend at work has the Ford Explorer with third row seating and finds the third row to be useless. It's a smaller row than a minivan would have, especially for head space so it's hard for people to climb back there. It also takes up the cargo/trunk space in the back, so she often needs to fold the seat down. The middle row are bucket seats with no optional middle section to pull down, so no one can sit in the middle. And her bucket seats have car seats in them for her kids, so if she needs to drive more than one other person, the third person has to crawl into the third row.

Everyone to whom I've talked that has one of the new Pacificas LOVES it.

The interior is really, really nice!

We bought a 2016 Odyssey last year and I love it! It handles well, it's user friendly (I hated the stow and go seats in the grand Carvan we had), and it held up well in a recent accident.

We have a Sedona rental due to that accident and it is sweet! It is super sporty and the interior feels more high end than our Odyssey. But they cost as much as an Odyssey and they still don't hold their value in our area.

We've had two Grand Caravans and I hated them both. The new Pacifica still doesn't appeal to me.

Our Grand Caravan has been good to us.

But I have to agree - we rented a Sedona in June, & it was fun! It feels sportier, & I really liked the interior.

I read, though, that you can't take the 2nd row seats out.

I have NOT been impressed w/ the interior of the Odysseys we've seen.

However, I do see the point about getting something that holds its value like the Honda or Toyota.

I just wish they had the styling & interiors of the Kia or the Chrysler.

Aargh... this is soooo hard!

There are pros & cons w/ each van.

Years ago, when we traded in our little Saturn for a Chevrolet Venture minivan, we really weren't in the position to "choose". We took what was available. And, then, when that van died & we had to have something else, we were really grateful to get our Grand Caravan - but, again, there wasn't a lot of choosing. We took what was available.
 
Last edited:
LOL. The V-8 was 4.6 liters. About as small a V-8 as you can get. My Suburban has a 7.4. That is a big V-8.
Pretty tempermental vehicles. There is a British car repair place 3 doors down from my mechanic. They must be pretty good because issues the Land Rover dealer can't fix, they sublet to this shop. Lots of Rolls Royces there too.

Ferrari had a 2.0 liter V-8. It was really just a block designed for their 3.0 liter V-8, but they had to deal with new taxes on large engines. They decided to just not bore as deep to reduce the displacement. I be.ive Lotus designed their 3.5 liter V-8 around the design of a 1.8 liter inline 4.

You want big displacement? Try a locomotive. The engines that Cummins or GE make for locomotives displace over 10 liters per cylinder.
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE


New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top Bottom