Every time I read about the issue of stamina in the use of a GAC, I get more confused! If the GAC is not supposed to be used because of stamina, what *are* the appropriate reasons for the kind of GAC that allows use of the Fastpass line without a Fastpass?
I have read people here say that if they hadn't used it for their child with autism, then their child wouldn't have been able to enjoy the park, or at least not nearly as much. I have 2 DDs who are quadriplegics, and one also has a metabolic disorder (cytochrome c-oxidase difficiency), and I can say that using that GAC as a Fastpass our last two trips has made the same difference in their ability to enjoy the park. DDs' issues are different--stamina, heat and cold intolerance, and having time-consuming, complicated lives--but the effect of this accommodation is the same: the GAC that acts as a FP has meant my DDs could enjoy the park in a way they could not without it. So, does Disney consider one of those reasons (autism) valid but not the other?
The first year of Fastpass, we didn't get a GAC, and we trekked back and forth getting passes. It was exhausting for the girls to crisscross the park in their power chairs, and making it back to the right ride at the right time was a logistical nightmare when combined with backtracking to find companion restrooms, going to the first aid station to stretch out when leg cramps or fatigue set in, avoiding the heat as much as possible, taking twice as long to eat meals (because one DD cannot feed herself), finding a place to set up and take meds, feeding the one with the metabolic disorder a meal, snack, or constarch about every two hours, respositioning in wheelchairs, and so on. We tried sending just my DH out to get the Fastpasses for everyone, but it's too much for me to manage both the girls for even a short time, especially in a crowded park where their needs are accelerated by heat and other stresses. Talk about a trip when we didn't do much! And, like others, we can only stay a few hours under the best of circumstances.
It's not like using the FP line means front of line access. At attractions like Buzz or the Safari, by the time we wait for the wheelchair vehicle, I don't think we usually gain time. If we got in the regular line, we would wait our turn like everyone else and *then* wait again for the special vehicle. So using the FP line is more or less an equalizer. For us, using the FP line is not so much about cutting down on time as it is about cutting down on wear and tear on the girls. It's also just more feasible to use the FP at the time we approach an attraction than to try to fit the return times in around all of the girls' physical and medical needs.
I'm not at all discounting the need for people who have autism to have a GAC. Our three kids all have varying degrees of SI issues, and we know a number of kids with autism, including our nephew, so I understand the situation well enough to get it. But, without a GAC, stamina--along with other issues related to their disabilities--keeps our DDs from enjoying the park in the way a non-disabled person does, so why is endurance not a valid reason for accommodation? We can't solve their endurance issues by renting wheelchairs.
Or am I just not understanding the whole stamina issue?