I guess I am missing something...
If you are current on your payments, why not just put the house on the market and sell it the old fashioned way? Why opt for a short sale which is so much more complicated and drawn out?
I understand if you cannot make your payments, that is a whole different situation.
PS--I love the posts where people are struggling to pay their mortgage but have WDW trips or cruises planned! Sorry, I digress.
First I should preface this by saying my comments may have absolutely nothing to do with anyone in this thread, I have no idea what their reasons were/are.
In my location I see the same things over and over...
1. People who used risky loan products like the 0 down, intrest only nonsense that was so prevalent. Still don't understand how those folks are "home owners". But I digress.
2. People who used their home as an extra wage earner since every time they built up a little equity they pulled it out via HELOC. I've seen folks whose house have doubled in price since they bought, but they still ended up as a SS or foreclosure. It's crazy.
i'm a realtor in NY and it really depends on your bank, the state you live in and how short you will be.....alot of banks are actually not approving short sales (especally here in NY) but are signing a lein release with an agreement that the seller can be held liable for the difference between the purchase price and mortgage amount. Talk to your mortgage company and see what they have to say....it's usually a LONG process to get short sale approval if you can get it at all
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of a short sale? I thought a short sale meant the bank agrees to the purchase price and releases the borrower from the mortgage, writing off the difference...or am I wrong?
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of a short sale? I thought a short sale meant the bank agrees to the purchase price and releases the borrower from the mortgage, writing off the difference...or am I wrong?
I guess I am missing something...
If you are current on your payments, why not just put the house on the market and sell it the old fashioned way? Why opt for a short sale which is so much more complicated and drawn out?
I do believe your understanding is incorrect. Traditionally (before the housing breakdown) you had to pay the difference between a short sale and the remaining balance on your mortgage. I.E. If you owed the bank $250,000 but the house sold for $200,000 you still had to make payments to the bank on the remaining $50,000.
However, since the mortgage breakdown things have changed and in some cases banks will accept the short sale as payment in full. But like a pp indicated you need to make sure you have that in writing up front.
Short sales are really used primarily when the house will only sell for less than what you owe on it.
Doesn't that defeat the purpose of a short sale? I thought a short sale meant the bank agrees to the purchase price and releases the borrower from the mortgage, writing off the difference...or am I wrong?
I do believe your understanding is incorrect. Traditionally (before the housing breakdown) you had to pay the difference between a short sale and the remaining balance on your mortgage. I.E. If you owed the bank $250,000 but the house sold for $200,000 you still had to make payments to the bank on the remaining $50,000.
However, since the mortgage breakdown things have changed and in some cases banks will accept the short sale as payment in full. But like a pp indicated you need to make sure you have that in writing up front.
Short sales are really used primarily when the house will only sell for less than what you owe on it.