Because there are just some decisions we make as a society that have absolutely nothing to do with money. Bill Bennett got in trouble for trying to explain that....
Ah well I think it is a waste of money to keep her around but that is just me.
Because there are just some decisions we make as a society that have absolutely nothing to do with money. Bill Bennett got in trouble for trying to explain that....
I only hope none of the people on this thread ever have to face mental illness either personally or through a family member. The lack of compassion I see toward the mentally ill just makes me sick, as do the holier than thou attitudes of those that have never been in such a situation.
Feralpeg said:I only hope none of the people on this thread ever have to face mental illness either personally or through a family member. The lack of compassion I see toward the mentally ill just makes me sick, as do the holier than thou attitudes of those that have never been in such a situation. It is much easier to condem someone than try to understand them.
Charles actually it isn't.It costs 3 times more to execute someone than it does to keep them locked up for lifeCharlesTD said:Oh I agree but putting somone inteh hospital for many many years that has killed her children is costing you more than an execution would in the long run IMHO so my feeling is why waste that much money over the long period when you can cull the mentally unstable lady from the herd and be done with it.
Hey,I'm not doing that at all... I think she was horribly failed..By nearly everyone from the medical community to the courtsFeralpeg said:I only hope none of the people on this thread ever have to face mental illness either personally or through a family member. The lack of compassion I see toward the mentally ill just makes me sick, as do the holier than thou attitudes of those that have never been in such a situation. It is much easier to condem someone than try to understand them.
marybet said:Yes I do. That woman needs to be in a hospital getting the help she needs. I never thought she should go to prison.
Never,ever releasedCharade said:Then what?
missypie said:WE HAVE GOT TO FIGURE OUT A BETTER WAY TO DETERMINE WHO IS NUTS ENOUGH TO KILL THEIR KIDS AND EITHER TREAT THEM OR TAKE THE KIDS AWAY BEFORE IT HAPPENS!!!
Charade said:Then what?
JennyMominRI said:Charles actually it isn't.It costs 3 times more to execute someone than it does to keep them locked up for life
marybet said:She will never be released. Some of you may not believe it but I think the woman is devastated by what she did, when she is aware of what she did.
She killed her children because the voices in her head told her to. She didn't do it like Susan Smith so she could be with another man, she didn't do it because she hated her children, she didn't do it to get insurance money, she did it because she is mentally ill.
Wish I lived in Fl said:As for the shellshocked Grandfather that was hospitalized so he wouldn't harm others. That is exactly what has been lost in America, budget cuts closed down many mental hospitals and now the mentally ill have to fight hard for a slight chance of covered treatment just when they they are least competent.
One man was executed (i think it was in Texas), his family had begged for treatment for himbut was refused because there wasn't "proof" he was a danger to others. Then when he finally did kill, the evidence of his mental illness was denied to the jurors. Again it was schizophrenia.
i kinda agree with thisPRINCESS VIJA said:NO way! She killed her kids. KILLED THEM! No sympathy what so ever. Her kids will never get a second chance at life. Neither should she.