FlightlessDuck
Y kant Donald fly?
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2006
- Messages
- 21,804
Oh and look..another increase.
http://blog.touringplans.com/2016/03/09/disney-dining-plan-rates-increasing/
The regular dining plan went up by 3%. If Disney raises a la carte pricing by 3% (which is likely...and at BoG, the increases were significantly higher than that), then the debate rages on becomes the pricing will be a wash. But as you note, if the a la carte pricing goes up by 7%, or 10%, then the DP actually becomes more attractive, if that is the way one likes to eat. It's hard to say, since Disney didn't create the DP to save people money. They created the DP to trap people into eating all their meals on site.So many have said that it's very difficult to get your money's worth on the DDP. I had wondered if the menu price increases were put in place to push more folks to the Dining Plan but now that's going up too!
Good to knowI am a Universal noob, and have yet to take that final step there. But, I will. WDW has me thisclose to converting. Ugh.
Oh and look..another increase.
http://blog.touringplans.com/2016/03/09/disney-dining-plan-rates-increasing/
You are absolutely right if we all keep paying it then there is no reason for Disney to change. I do wonder though if this could be a first step to creating differences in the resort amenities and almost creating "premium" resort packages in the way of increased fees. If access to EMH and FP at 60 days etc are being "paid for" by an additional resort fee (as opposed to being included in the room rate) what is to stop Disney from creating multiple resort fee structures that include various levels of amenities for resort guests? Like $15 per room per day gets you parking and/or magical express, access to FP at 60 days and magic bands and $25 gets you those plus EMH and a fourth fast pass (or access to FP at 90 days)????? We all know Disney loves creating "special packages" lolIf the price is going up $15 per night, what difference does it make if it's in the base rate or tacked on at the end? I don't understand the difference.
Ultimately, this is supply and demand pricing. Disney will continue to raise rates and find creative ways to raise them, until the demand goes down. It's up to us, really.
Give Universal a try. The Hard Rock Hotel beats virtually all WDW hotels for service and amenities. Free Express Pass and early entry plus you can walk to the parks. The best rides at Universal blow away the best ones at WDW. But WDW has them beat in theming and detail in a big way.
In defense of Disney...
Itemized billing and pay-per-service billing is quite in fashion right now. You're already paying to the service, it's just included in the all-in price you pay. Each year, the price of this service goes up, it just gets buried in with all-in price increase.
If you're someone that does not use these services or amenities, do you like subsidizing everyone else? Of course not.
I, for one, appreciate that everyone else subsidizes my Magic Express transportation.
The fact is, the resorts are packed, the parks are packed and it is the responsibility of Disney management to maximize shareholder value. Now and into the future. How that happens is up for debate.
(Now I'll go hide)
I was thinking the same thing-people who get a room for around $100 a night would be paying an additional $105 per week at check in on fees (might not seem like a lot but might break the budget for some)$15 is a pretty big percentage to value resorts lowest rates.
If the price is going up $15 per night, what difference does it make if it's in the base rate or tacked on at the end? I don't understand the difference.
Ultimately, this is supply and demand pricing. Disney will continue to raise rates and find creative ways to raise them, until the demand goes down. It's up to us, really.
a resort fee might well push us into the staying offsite group. Mainly because it would annoy me. They're cutting people and services - raising prices and then tacking on a resort fee - I would just be done staying onsite for awhile. We'd pay for parking - use the MBs we already have and just make FP at 30 days (which since we travel during the 'slower' season wouldn't be tragic)
If the price is going up $15 per night, what difference does it make if it's in the base rate or tacked on at the end? I don't understand the difference.
Ultimately, this is supply and demand pricing. Disney will continue to raise rates and find creative ways to raise them, until the demand goes down. It's up to us, really.
You are absolutely right if we all keep paying it then there is no reason for Disney to change. I do wonder though if this could be a first step to creating differences in the resort amenities and almost creating "premium" resort packages in the way of increased fees. If access to EMH and FP at 60 days etc are being "paid for" by an additional resort fee (as opposed to being included in the room rate) what is to stop Disney from creating multiple resort fee structures that include various levels of amenities for resort guests? Like $15 per room per day gets you parking and/or magical express, access to FP at 60 days and magic bands and $25 gets you those plus EMH and a fourth fast pass (or access to FP at 90 days)????? We all know Disney loves creating "special packages" lol
I'm gonna be completely honest, and I hope people don't take offense to this, everytime an increase in price happens a little part of me is a tiny bit excited because maybe it will discourage people from going and the resorts and parks will be less crowded lol I know that is terrible but oh well. Because the other part of me is saying if they keep like this I might not be able to afford it one day lol
Remember decades ago when it was $35 ($10 for kids) and included an app and, importantly, the tip. Oh, that was only in 2005? Never mind.![]()
Compared to our trip in May 2013, the price has gone up more than 50%. But that's because the Canadian dollar has sunk against the Greenback so much.
There are definitely fewer Canadian travellers going to Disney this year. Even flights down south have been reduced. So that should help!
I understand completely what you're saying about higher prices, fewer guests, smaller crowds, shorter waits.
The difference is twofold.
First, resort fees could and probably would be excluded for discounts.
Second, and the basis for my question, is this outrage due to an emotional response to the wording (charging a resort fee for what we once were told was free perks to staying onsite), or a logical response to increased pricing (assessing whether or not Disney continues to be in a family's budget or worth the increasing costs to visit)?