Am I the only one who doesn't get the "Occupy Wallstreet" movements

Status
Not open for further replies.
too bad, that is the price we pay for living in a free society. No where does it say "the right to gather" only if the city can afford it!! Your taxes go to pay for some things unfortunately that you don't like. You know how long my taxes went to pay for those stupid mummers day parades. LOL, not to mention the overtime to pay cops to sit in the front of streets around citizen bank park to make sure people don't park in south philly neighborhoods. Really, like people parking there one night is going to destroy the neighborhood.

Yes, I vote and I protest. deal with it. the city will just have to pay. what, you can protest but only if it's affordable and you can't in any way inconvenience anyone. LOL.

Agree -
I wonder how much did the IRAQ war cost us? How much did the banks toying with our mortgages cost us as a country? How much did it cost Americans to rebuild all those bridges and schools overseas - or train their soldiers ? Why are we busy fighting for scraps for our children's education and our infrastructure....when that money is being sent overseas...:mad:
 
Oh and most people can't just run for office. It cost money. In some districts in NJ almost 500K bond must be offered. That's another of the problems with our system you either have to have very deep pockets or you get deep pockets to pay for you which leads to the morons we now have in Congress.
Surely you're aware that surety bonds for public officials aren't too dissimilar to liability insurance coverage and only costs a small fraction of the bond value. Many states even require Notary Publics to carry such bonds (though at lower amounts). And people can start small. A local former long-term Congressman from our area that just died started out his career on a local city commission and worked his way up from here. I find the fatalism expressed by so many of "Occupy Whatever" folks and their supporters that they are effectively helpless in their current state due to the evil forces arrayed against them mind boggling.
 
ok maybe calling the guy with a note deriding OTHER people as useless.....a LEMMING was harsh? wait ....let me think about that...Well .He actually was doing the same...was he not? dismissing a segment of the population saying he made it because he worked hard and they just need to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" and all will be well.

Would you care to comment on items posted like
"...These are inescapable facts. Housing prices have skyrocketed.
How is it that a typical family in 1970s only needed ONE working parent. .....that is not possible today. How is it that our home that I lived in for 20 years..was the cost of my fathers annual income.The average american home NOW is 4-8 times their annual income."
or any of the graphs? I would like to have a discussion on things that matter rather than my tone. Ill try harder not to be dismissive to a person who is clearly being dismissive. :thumbsup2 ie the super cool NOTE guy...

Odd. I don't think we read the same thing.

The guy talked about Wall St. and how it works. Wall St. being scapegoats. Tearing down Wall St. will hurt those that are wanting to tear it down. Doing jobs for themselves. A shot at the administration and survival. He could have presented it better. But I didn't see anything about, "... dismissing a segment of the population saying he made it because he worked hard and they just need to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" and all will be well". That quote just wasn't there and can't be paraphrased from what he wrote.

I get that you don't agree with him. He's the enemy of OWS. But he didn't say the things you attributed to him. That actually does matter.

It seems we are not destined to agree on much.

As far as the housing prices skyrocketing, there are many variables that come into play. One such variable is people typically didn't buy "starter" homes like they did in the 70's. They bought homes that people years ago aspired to have once they "made it".

Anyway, there has been a decline in housing prices for the last few years.
 
Well said and I am one of the lucky ones with a 2 income household with good insurance, but I see how those beneath me suffer on a daily basis. It's really bad out there for a lot of folks and it's going to take a movement like this to really cause some change in the way this country is run.

I agree except I am one of the mostly lucky ones. DH and I have jobs, but he hasn't had a raise in 4 years and I got a 4% pay cut over the last two years. Our medical insurance has steadily gone up each year. We now pay out f pocket almost $400.00 a month for medicines because in my 3 person family, we all medical issues that require expensive medications. Still, I feel lucky to have insurance at all.

I used to be one of those "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and just work harder sort of people until I ended up with a debilitating illness that makes working quite difficult for me. I do work though, because I have to. But now I understand that, unless you have been in a situation where you do all you can do, but it is still not enough, then you really just won't get it.
 

Surely you're aware that surety bonds for public officials aren't too dissimilar to liability insurance coverage and only costs a small fraction of the bond value. Many states even require Notary Publics to carry such bonds (though at lower amounts). And people can start small. A local former long-term Congressman from our area that just died started out his career on a local city commission and worked his way up from here. I find the fatalism expressed by so many of "Occupy Whatever" folks and their supporters that they are effectively helpless in their current state due to the evil forces arrayed against them mind boggling.

Probably no more mind boggling than the "pie in the sky" perception that people here have that makes them believe: anyone can walk into a doctors office and get quality healthcare, anyone can walk into a bank and get funding for a new business and all it takes to run for office is a "wing and a prayer" or my personal favorite "all they have to do is get a job"! Like the 1 million or so people currently unemployeed had no clue it was so easy to just go out and "get a job". wow, imagine that's all takes, saying "get a job" and we could have had this pesky unemployment problem solved! nope, Im not be sarcastic, I actual laugh when I read that line because its borders on insanity IMO.

Actually the OWS folks are not fatalistic, they actually believe their movement will change some thing.
 
Agree - How much did the banks toying with our mortgages cost us as a country?
More than we'll know and for a very long time..... However......

As far as the housing prices skyrocketing, there are many variables that come into play. One such variable is people typically didn't buy "starter" homes like they did in the 70's. They bought homes that people years ago aspired to have once they "made it".

Anyway, there has been a decline in housing prices for the last few years.

There's a mindset that some people want to say they were the "victim" of unscrupulous mortgage practices, but there are many who knew clearly what they were getting into. Those individuals knew they couldn't afford it, but expected that others would bail them out. And that's what the American people are doing now.
 
Probably no more mind boggling than the "pie in the sky" perception that people here have that makes them believe...
I agree that the "just get a job" sentiments are just as off-base... but standing around with signs largely stating that your woes are the results of others and want others to do something about it seems pretty fatalistic to me.

Actually the OWS folks are not fatalistic, they actually believe their movement will change some thing.
OK, so what's their "exit strategy"? I mean, we've already been doing this "change" thing for a couple of years now.
 
/
OK, so what's their "exit strategy"? I mean, we've already been doing this "change" thing for a couple of years now.

Again, this isn't a left or right thing. Many are unhappy with BOTH sides. A lot of people in this country are hurting.
 
I agree that the "just get a job" sentiments are just as off-base... but standing around with signs largely stating that your woes are the results of others and want others to do something about it seems pretty fatalistic to me.

OK, so what's their "exit strategy"? I mean, we've already been doing this "change" thing for a couple of years now.

So, this is just my rambling Geoff, maybe a little of what I "hope" happens.

1) LOL. I hope the ****oo's with the stupid signs fade away. :rotfl: From the few, very few people I've talked to in Philly who have been protesting on the weekend, they actually have some legitimate worries and many points that I totally agree with.

2) I think the exit strategy is more of trying to figure out how they can organize and become a continuous entity. I think they are aware that they will have to eventually leave the parks but like many other movements they've accomplished goal one: attention. Now they have to figure out how to move from "attention to the problem" to constructive action in fixing the problem.
 
I just love all the respect that the OWS gang receives from so many from this thread to the mainstream media to the White House.

But once again, the Tea Party is called a sexually derogatory term, this time by this administration's rep U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

Solis offered harsh words about conservatives. Looking at 2012, Solis slammed the tea party movement, calling them “teabaggers” and promising the Obama administration will take them on.

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/carrying-water-barack-obama-hilda-solis-picks-fight-tea-party

Oh yeah. This is working great, isn't it? Bringing everyone together?
 
So, this is just my rambling Geoff, maybe a little of what I "hope" happens.
It's easy to express common concerns. The real fun starts when your point #2 kicks in. As Acklander pointed out, you know a movement isn't just "left" or "right" when it's endorsed by both the Communist Party USA and the American Nazi Party, and personalities like Nancy Pelosi and David Duke. It'll be entertaining to see what common set of changes will be emerge from this meeting of the minds.
 
It's easy to express common concerns. The real fun starts when your point #2 kicks in. As Acklander pointed out, you know a movement isn't just "left" or "right" when it's endorsed by both the Communist Party USA and the American Nazi Party, and personalities like Nancy Pelosi and David Duke. It'll be entertaining to see what common set of changes will be emerge from this meeting of the minds.

Be very very afraid.:scared1:

Government is there to protect personal property, not take it. Doesn't apply here, but thought the words were good ones.
 
I just love all the respect that the OWS gang receives from so many from this thread to the mainstream media to the White House.

But once again, the Tea Party is called a sexually derogatory term, this time by this administration's rep U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.



http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/carrying-water-barack-obama-hilda-solis-picks-fight-tea-party

Oh yeah. This is working great, isn't it? Bringing everyone together?

Your quote was only the words written by the story's author. There was no quote in there from the US Labor Secretary. If Secretary Solis has a quote that was offensive, as you believe, and as the writer believes, please print that to back up your point, not just the partisan writer's biased interpretation of Secretary Solis' speech. Journalism 101 stuff. Thank You.
 
I just love all the respect that the OWS gang receives from so many from this thread to the mainstream media to the White House.

But once again, the Tea Party is called a sexually derogatory term, this time by this administration's rep U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.



http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/carrying-water-barack-obama-hilda-solis-picks-fight-tea-party

Oh yeah. This is working great, isn't it? Bringing everyone together?
Are you trying to get this thread closed? I think we have had a polite (mostly) non political discussion until now. Why ruin it just to get your partisan digs in?
 
I wonder if someone went down to the occupy wall st. folks and handed them a basic economics exam, how many could actually pass it?

Who these corporations everyone keeps talking about?
Where does the money you/your parents make in their 401k come from?
If there weren't corporations how much would a loaf of bread, soda, a laptop, iphone, shoes, meat, etc. cost (more/less)?

I agree there have been some big time mistakes that have caused our econimic problems, but it wasn't the corporations who created them.

How about getting after the people who handed out all of those bailouts? How about those who voted to pressure banks to give mortgages to those who couldn't afford them, or money to companies they knew were going to fail?

Finally, what do you think is considered inequality?

Someone who works 40+ hours a week, pays there mortage, paid off all of their school loans, paid off other debt, and supports their family; or someone who gets 4 years of unemployment because it cost them more to actually get a job (I've been told by several unemployed people I know:headache:), getting bailed out of your forclosure, having your school loan paid off after 20 years and only having to pay a small percentage of the loan each year.

Just tired off those who work hard and do the right things having to pay for many others who work the system.
 
I just love all the respect that the OWS gang receives from so many from this thread to the mainstream media to the White House.

But once again, the Tea Party is called a sexually derogatory term, this time by this administration's rep U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/carrying-water-barack-obama-hilda-solis-picks-fight-tea-party

Oh yeah. This is working great, isn't it? Bringing everyone together?

As I try to teach my girls(because I want them to understand they are accountable for their behavior), do unto others as you would have done unto you. (don't know the precise wording off hand). That's where the adults and the adolescents make their choice of words in any debate.
 
It's easy to express common concerns. The real fun starts when your point #2 kicks in. As Acklander pointed out, you know a movement isn't just "left" or "right" when it's endorsed by both the Communist Party USA and the American Nazi Party, and personalities like Nancy Pelosi and David Duke. It'll be entertaining to see what common set of changes will be emerge from this meeting of the minds.

Be very very afraid.:scared1:

Government is there to protect personal property, not take it. Doesn't apply here, but thought the words were good ones.

:rotfl2: And I will remind both of you that I am a civil right child a product and participate of a so called movement. The same could and was said of the civil rights movement when we started. Including all the very popular "ism" and how Coloreds were out to "steal" every bodies property and how Black men were going to rape, pillage and plunder if they were not "kept" in their place.
Folks were told to be "very afraid" back then too.


Turned out we weren't communist, socialist, pillagers or plunders.....

And of course the movement against the Vietnam war was also nothing but a buck of hippies looking to bring down America with their free love and socialism. that some how never materialized and we got some great music out of it to boot.

And let's not even start with the Gay movement. We had all these folks running around screaming on how Gays were the demise of our society, what with the gay movement out to convert everyone and destroy marriage as we know it, although Kim Kardashian is doing fine on wrecking that institute all by her lonesome.

Just tweeking a bit of fun at you guys. Sorry but I've live through waaay to many supposedly "attacks on our way of life", so if I was a betting gal, I'd place my money on capitalism being alive and well in the next 100 years or so.

Like I always say, walmart is still doing a booming business.

Don't you ever find it funny that so many folks parade David Dukes out whenever they want you to be afraid of some thing and yet ole David is barely a foot note in his community? Although I hear he's thinking about running for President again. Wasn't he attending the Tea Party rallies also? Seems David is pretty smart, he's hitching his wagon on any thing with a tv camera attached to it.
 
Just tweeking a bit of fun at you guys. Sorry but I've live through waaay to many supposedly "attacks on our way of life", so if I was a betting gal, I'd place my money on capitalism being alive and well in the next 100 years or so.
Perhaps my point was a bit too nuanced, but I wasn't trying to pigeonhole "Occupy Whatever" supporters as being either Nazis or Commies. I was speaking to your point that the next phase will include determining "constructive action in fixing the problem." I pointed out two actual, very philosophically different, organizations that have thrown their official support to the "movement" and I will guess would offer two very different sets of "actions". This is just one example of the philosophical "Tower of Babel" that has claimed the "Occupy" label. It's going to be very entertaining to watch what sort of "common ground" comes out of this process, if it ever gets that far, and to see if it will be commonly supported.
 
I agree there have been some big time mistakes that have caused our econimic problems, but it wasn't the corporations who created them.

How about getting after the people who handed out all of those bailouts? How about those who voted to pressure banks to give mortgages to those who couldn't afford them, or money to companies they knew were going to fail?

Finally, what do you think is considered inequality?


AIG.... they get bailed out for making poor investment decisions. They get bailed out with our tax $$$. The end of the year, they throw a huge party and give all of their super high salaried employees bonus checks that are larger than the average yearly pay for some people (the very people who actually paid out with their tax $$). Have I answered and demonstrated who is responsible.. and yes, this is who OWS is going after, those that have done this. They aren't looking to bring down just Corporate America, but Corporate Greedy America.. that is who... Oh, and those bonus checks... I think they may have been exempt from full taxes too.. not too sure... was my answer to your satisfaction.. do you get what we are saying now. We aren't begrudging the average Joe & Mary who work 40+ hours, pay all their bills on time, have made payments to pay off all their loans.... not at all. We are standing up for them.. We are saying if they can do it, why can't greedy corporate America do it without our help.. without Joe & Mary's help.. :thumbsup2

and if Joe & Mary had lost their jobs, they would have lost their home, their car and their health insurance.. would tax $$'s have bailed them out as they did the large corporations? NO, they would not have.. and have the large corporations paid us back, no they have not. If Joe & Mary do not pay back their debts, they ruin their credit.. The large corporations just continue on... Joe and Mary get further behind... get the bigger picture now.... :sad2:
 
AIG.... they get bailed out for making poor investment decisions. They get bailed out with our tax $$$. The end of the year, they throw a huge party and give all of their super high salaried employees bonus checks that are larger than the average yearly pay for some people (the very people who actually paid out with their tax $$). Have I answered and demonstrated who is responsible.. and yes, this is who OWS is going after, those that have done this. They aren't looking to bring down just Corporate America, but Corporate Greedy America.. that is who... Oh, and those bonus checks... I think they may have been exempt from full taxes too.. not too sure... was my answer to your satisfaction.. do you get what we are saying now. We aren't begrudging the average Joe & Mary who work 40+ hours, pay all their bills on time, have made payments to pay off all their loans.... not at all. We are standing up for them.. We are saying if they can do it, why can't greedy corporate America do it without our help.. without Joe & Mary's help.. :thumbsup2

and if Joe & Mary had lost their jobs, they would have lost their home, their car and their health insurance.. would tax $$'s have bailed them out as they did the large corporations? NO, they would not have.. and have the large corporations paid us back, no they have not. If Joe & Mary do not pay back their debts, they ruin their credit.. The large corporations just continue on... Joe and Mary get further behind... get the bigger picture now.... :sad2:

:thumbsup2 thank you for this post
 
Status
Not open for further replies.





New Posts









Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top