Tiggerlovinggrandma
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 427
DD, DSIL and I were talking today about DGS when DDe tells me she and DSIL believe in just telling their child NO when it comes to him getting into things or doing things he shouldn't. They use no precautions or child proofing methods whatsoever.
For example
DD and her husband have a screen door and a regular one on the front and back of their house. They leave the larger door open when they are home during the day and just have the screen one covering. The screen door has no lock and all you have to do is touch it and its open. They live on an extremely busy street. She says its enough for them to tell their 17 mo old son NO when he nears the door. She says they never leave him alone when the door is open. All I have to say to this is
They also do not lock up nor put away such items as candles that are lit, medications or cleaners. She says they are teaching son not to touch, etc. And my responce to this is
I know she is a young first time mother
(22) but I feel both she and SIL (27) are being foolish and naive as well.
I believe that teaching a child what he can and can't do is all well and good but I feel a 17 mo old is way too young to completely understand the concept of NO and the dangers that may be at hand. I believe some things need further precaution. Putting up medications, locking up cleansers and locking the front and back doors, installing gates on stairways. etc. I believe with parenthood comes responcilbility. I believe they are placing the sole responcibilty for their son's safety on him and not on her and her husband. They do not have to put up, lock up everything or chain hime to a chair but there needs to be some extra steps taken for his well being. She calls me old fashioned and overprotective. When I asked DSIL what he would think if DS was to get hurt, burned, etc and his answer was "He'll only do it once" WHAT!!!!
Now I know I have already said they were both being foolish and naive but did I also say HE was being stupid too, if not let me add it here. Don't get me wrong I love my DSIL but there are times when I would just like to... WELL that's a story for another day.
Have I completely loss it? Am I too protective? I know my DGS isTHEIR child and THEY need to make THEIR rules for him but I can't help feeling they are way off base here. What do you think? Have any other granparents on thgre board had the same issues with their children? I know every generation is different. I have told my DD that even though DH and I do not agreed with her and DSIL's thoughts on the subject we will respect them as parents but understand that at our house we will follow our rules and have a gate across the stairs, our front and back doors locked, medications up and cleansers locked away along with knives, matches, lighters, etc. We will happily teach DGS what the word NO means but take some precautions as well.
For example
DD and her husband have a screen door and a regular one on the front and back of their house. They leave the larger door open when they are home during the day and just have the screen one covering. The screen door has no lock and all you have to do is touch it and its open. They live on an extremely busy street. She says its enough for them to tell their 17 mo old son NO when he nears the door. She says they never leave him alone when the door is open. All I have to say to this is
They also do not lock up nor put away such items as candles that are lit, medications or cleaners. She says they are teaching son not to touch, etc. And my responce to this is
I know she is a young first time mother (22) but I feel both she and SIL (27) are being foolish and naive as well.
I believe that teaching a child what he can and can't do is all well and good but I feel a 17 mo old is way too young to completely understand the concept of NO and the dangers that may be at hand. I believe some things need further precaution. Putting up medications, locking up cleansers and locking the front and back doors, installing gates on stairways. etc. I believe with parenthood comes responcilbility. I believe they are placing the sole responcibilty for their son's safety on him and not on her and her husband. They do not have to put up, lock up everything or chain hime to a chair but there needs to be some extra steps taken for his well being. She calls me old fashioned and overprotective. When I asked DSIL what he would think if DS was to get hurt, burned, etc and his answer was "He'll only do it once" WHAT!!!!
Now I know I have already said they were both being foolish and naive but did I also say HE was being stupid too, if not let me add it here. Don't get me wrong I love my DSIL but there are times when I would just like to... WELL that's a story for another day.
Have I completely loss it? Am I too protective? I know my DGS isTHEIR child and THEY need to make THEIR rules for him but I can't help feeling they are way off base here. What do you think? Have any other granparents on thgre board had the same issues with their children? I know every generation is different. I have told my DD that even though DH and I do not agreed with her and DSIL's thoughts on the subject we will respect them as parents but understand that at our house we will follow our rules and have a gate across the stairs, our front and back doors locked, medications up and cleansers locked away along with knives, matches, lighters, etc. We will happily teach DGS what the word NO means but take some precautions as well.
(Now I am lucky to read the newspaper!) Anyway, would they be at all receptive if you got them a gift subscription, and then would they even read it? There are always safety articles.

