This is really "GoofyDad869" posting (too lazy & too early in the mornin' to login as myself):
It would appear with the new dining "features" they are doing exactly that. We were there the week of 10/9-10/16, and every day there was a sign in front of Town Hall by 10:00am stating:
********************************************************
"No further Table Service dining available for today. We recommend the following Counter Service Restaurants for your Disney dining.
(List of MK CS)
No Priority Seating required. Check Guidemap for locations & menus."
********************************************************
We took a photo of the sign. I'm not sure if similar signs were up at the other Theme Parks - we just knew where to look for it at MK.
I think it would be logical for Disney to do one (or more) of the following:
A) Post typical park schedules & EMH at or before the 90-day ADR window.
B) Tighten the ADR window to the 60-day (or 45-day, 30-day, whatever it is they do now) window that they release the park hours.
C) Tie ALL ADRs to a credit card for reference.
D) Set a cancellation policy and stick to it.
For example:
All cancellations to 7 days of the reservation time no penalty,
All cancellations within 7 days to 2 days charge a $10 penalty,
All cancellations within 2 days to time of reservation charge a $20 penalty,
No-shows charge a $50 penalty
E) Set 'acceptable' cancellation rules and tie them to each ADR (acceptable cancellations would stuff like be: family member dies, party member dies, natural disaster occurs, etc. - similar to a trip insurance policy)
F) Set ADR adjustment rules and tie them to each ADR (like: party size changes from 4 people to 5 people - but not party size changes from 2 people to 12 people, time of ADR change half-hour before or after)
IMO, I think that Dining policies are the Parks' "Achilles Heel" right now. I mean, this is Disney we're talking about - not your average local Red Lobster. They have to know well in advance what their daily capacities are for their services (at least to within an acceptable range of say 3-5%) based on historical data, projections, staffing levels, etc. That's their business, and they obviously usually do it well. The only time I think they wouldn't might be after a major catastrophic event that would majorly affect tourism (like a 9/11-style attack somewhere in the US, an economic disaster, or a big hurricane coming through). Disney has made huge strides over the years (food quality & table service seems to be improving with each passing year). I'm probably greatly simplifying things here, so please point out any false assumptions I'm making here.
The 'system' isn't much of one right now - it seems to be at the discretion of the CM you happen to be talking to, about whether multiple same-time ADRs are allowed. So it's not really 'abuse' of the system that I've got beefs about. Rhetorical question: Is it really 'abuse' if the system allows it as status quo? I think the 'system' needs to be changed if it continues to allow this sort of thing.
Getting off my soapbox now...
It would appear with the new dining "features" they are doing exactly that. We were there the week of 10/9-10/16, and every day there was a sign in front of Town Hall by 10:00am stating:
********************************************************
"No further Table Service dining available for today. We recommend the following Counter Service Restaurants for your Disney dining.
(List of MK CS)
No Priority Seating required. Check Guidemap for locations & menus."
********************************************************
We took a photo of the sign. I'm not sure if similar signs were up at the other Theme Parks - we just knew where to look for it at MK.
I think it would be logical for Disney to do one (or more) of the following:
A) Post typical park schedules & EMH at or before the 90-day ADR window.
B) Tighten the ADR window to the 60-day (or 45-day, 30-day, whatever it is they do now) window that they release the park hours.
C) Tie ALL ADRs to a credit card for reference.
D) Set a cancellation policy and stick to it.
For example:
All cancellations to 7 days of the reservation time no penalty,
All cancellations within 7 days to 2 days charge a $10 penalty,
All cancellations within 2 days to time of reservation charge a $20 penalty,
No-shows charge a $50 penalty
E) Set 'acceptable' cancellation rules and tie them to each ADR (acceptable cancellations would stuff like be: family member dies, party member dies, natural disaster occurs, etc. - similar to a trip insurance policy)
F) Set ADR adjustment rules and tie them to each ADR (like: party size changes from 4 people to 5 people - but not party size changes from 2 people to 12 people, time of ADR change half-hour before or after)
IMO, I think that Dining policies are the Parks' "Achilles Heel" right now. I mean, this is Disney we're talking about - not your average local Red Lobster. They have to know well in advance what their daily capacities are for their services (at least to within an acceptable range of say 3-5%) based on historical data, projections, staffing levels, etc. That's their business, and they obviously usually do it well. The only time I think they wouldn't might be after a major catastrophic event that would majorly affect tourism (like a 9/11-style attack somewhere in the US, an economic disaster, or a big hurricane coming through). Disney has made huge strides over the years (food quality & table service seems to be improving with each passing year). I'm probably greatly simplifying things here, so please point out any false assumptions I'm making here.
The 'system' isn't much of one right now - it seems to be at the discretion of the CM you happen to be talking to, about whether multiple same-time ADRs are allowed. So it's not really 'abuse' of the system that I've got beefs about. Rhetorical question: Is it really 'abuse' if the system allows it as status quo? I think the 'system' needs to be changed if it continues to allow this sort of thing.
Getting off my soapbox now...


) and the cast member I spoke with said that they randomly screen for double bookings and cancel them...I heard someone mention this before and don't know how true it is but when I was making an ADR she said, "I see you have Chef Mickey's booked that night, are you sure you want me to cancel it?"
. Didn't mean to sound so arrogant. I realize my family's additions to WDW Dining coffers are but a teardrop in a vast ocean. But I do think that many frequent visitors are like us and do cherish the restaurants as well as the parks. Making it too difficult to enjoy Disney Dining would be counter productive. Has anyone else noticed friends/family who visit every decade or so just don't "get it" because they don't even try TS?