Colleen27
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,187
If Duke and those other schools really thought that identifying future Einsteins was such an important learning experience it would be free or low cost.
I don't think that's necessarily true. There are only so many dollars to go around, and the inherent mission of a college is college-level education, not community outreach or middle/high school level enrichment.
I think there's a very real backlash against the entire idea of gifted education in our country, thanks to broad overuse of the term. But it is a vicious cycle - gifted programs are important, but only to a small number of children. Because they only serve a small number of children and aren't mandated (as special ed is), they're first on the budgetary chopping block. So to justify the program, schools are under pressure to expand the definition of gifted to increase the number of students served, which then leads to a watering down of the term and the program, or to eliminate gifted education entirely. And then you end up with our current situation - gifted education is offered mainly in wealthy districts where pushy/competitive/overinvolved parents push for their high-achievers to be included regardless of actual giftedness, while programs in lower-income areas are eliminated.
