Bob Slydell said:I guess we'll agree to disagree then, because IMO, if you're checking your child out of school early AND lying about the reason you're doing so, then the school does have a say in that.
Wishing on a star said:Daxx,
So, once again, you are openly passing judgements.
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgements and openly Parent-Bashing because all of us have not run out and adopted from Foster Care. (And, many have!!!)
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgments regarding Oksana....
You have no right to issue these judgments.
They have nothing at all to do with 'teaching'.
It is blatant and unwarranted Parent-Bashing, pure and simple.
Your true colors are showing.
Wishing on a star said:Daxx,
So, once again, you are openly passing judgements.
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgements and openly Parent-Bashing because all of us have not run out and adopted from Foster Care. (And, many have!!!)
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgments regarding Oksana....
You have no right to issue these judgments.
They have nothing at all to do with 'teaching'.
It is blatant and unwarranted Parent-Bashing, pure and simple.
Your true colors are showing.
If they have state mandated attendance requirements, it absolutely is the schools business. In PA, private schools are REQUIRED to furnish "the name of any child absent 3 days or the equivalent without lawful excuse. School administrators failing to comply with the reporting requirements may be fined".Though I agree it is wrong to lie about why you are taking your child out of school early, it is of no concern of the school and they have no grounds for having a problem with it.
disykat said:For me the issue I disagree with the OP about isn't taking the child out of school - it's being surprised that the teacher would notice the child left sick and then showed up on the front page of the paper at the event - and then daring to comment on it.
I would actually have wondered why they didn't notice if it never came up.
I woudln't have a problem with a child checking out of school for the afternoon for something that is genuinely a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity -- especially in this case as it probably would've been impossible several hours later.pansmermaidzlagoon said:Shouldn't matter if it is the President, an athlete, whatever. If a child has an outside interest - I think it is fine to occassionally miss school, if you are encouraging your child's interests - as others have said school is not the only place to learn or to persue interests/knowledge.
I am also appauled to see my students wearing little more than swimsuit tops and cut-off jeans to the movie theater or the mall. I am appauled to see them standing outside smoking (hopefully only cigarettes) with boys too old for them, but I never say anything to them about these "out of school choices" because it's not my place. Still, it's hard for me to look at them the same way once they're back in my classroom.CheshireVal said:I agree. That premise is ridiculous. Teachers do have their own lives outside of work, you know.
When I go to the movies on Fri or Sat nights (which I've stopped doing lately), I see TONS of the kids from my school.... a lot of my students. I'm appalled by some of the things these 8th grade girls are wearing, but if I happen to catch their eye, I just smile and wave and go on with my night.
I have no rights to judge people, yet you're judging me!?!?!?Wishing on a star said:Daxx,
So, once again, you are openly passing judgements.
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgements and openly Parent-Bashing because all of us have not run out and adopted from Foster Care. (And, many have!!!)
Passing your own personal negative self-righteous judgments regarding Oksana....
You have no right to issue these judgments.
They have nothing at all to do with 'teaching'.
It is blatant and unwarranted Parent-Bashing, pure and simple.
Your true colors are showing.
Yep! Regardless of your position in life ... whether you're a teacher, a parent, a CEO, a doctor, a sales clerk, etc. (and I don't want anyone to feel left out of this, thus anyone think I am bashing receptionists for not including them) ... nobody likes to be lied to.MrsPete said:No one likes to be lied to
Exactly. And I think the fact that the OP didn't speak up for her DD after it was mentioned (a few times from the way she described it), does nothing but give the teacher more reason to suspect it was 'playing hooky' rather than a legit situation.And the ironic thing is that this whole situation would have been a non-issue if the mom (or daughter, but I know that my 12yo wouldn't have spoken up) had of just talked to the teacher when he said something to them. They could have just said, "We came home and she rested and felt well enough to go to the signing. Ordinarily, when coming home sick, I would have kept her in for the rest of the day, but this something that she likely won't get to do again and since she was feeling better we decided to go".
Honestly, did anyone really get the impression that the teacher was making a huge, big deal out of it? If he was, he could have taken this to another level and told the principal that there was an attendance issue. He does have the authority to do so as teachers are the ones who report attendance to the administration. Doesn't sound like he did.Even if the child is absent from school... That is an administrative issue, as outlined in written attendance policy. (Not a personal issue between a teacher and a child) Most schools allow a certain number of 'unexcused' absences. My reasons for pulling my child out of school, as long as my child meets required attendance levels, is simply non of the teachers business. And, most especially, A teacher has no right to question my child about the issue.