beachbunny
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2000
- Messages
- 1,274
Oh, and SIL swears her dog's a pure breed.
Tinijocaro said:I really don't get why some people are so opposed to mixed breeds. I agree that maybe they shouldn't cost as much as a purebred, but really, what's the problem? Mixing breeds often produce wonderful dogs and family pets. We looked into the bichi-poo, but the mother (poodle) was so ugly we went with a straight bichon. This "purebred is better" mentality makes me wonder what these people think of people of mixed races having children. I just think it's all good, as long as you have healthy parents, you have a great chance at getting a good dog.
Jackie

ug:
). The mixes are the right size, temperment, don't shed, etc and were carefully thought out and bred to be the best type of dogs for service work. What's happened since is a definate craze but I can understand wanting a medium sized dog who doesn't shed and has the personality of a lab. If they're bred correctly it should be a good thing. I guess that's the point with any breed, "if they're bred correctly". You can have lousy pure breds and lousy mixes if you have a lousy breeder.goofy! said:People the next street over paid over $1,500 for their mutt "labradoodle." (I am not picking on labradoodles - that is just the designer mutt in fashion right now). This is twice what I paid for my champion b**** Komondor, who was sired by a multi time best-in-show, multi time National breed winner and out of a ROM multiple group placing b****, both with obedience titles. The breeder has 35 years of experience under her belt and can tell me each and every dog, what they looked like, what their health issues were and why they were bred together for over seven generations. I have the assurance of over seven generations of good or excellent hips, elbows, eyes, thyroid and heart clearances. Why would I give somebody 2x the money for a dog without all those assurances. And I can guarantee you that my dogs don't look like anybody elses!
Tinijocaro said:I really don't get why some people are so opposed to mixed breeds. I agree that maybe they shouldn't cost as much as a purebred, but really, what's the problem? Mixing breeds often produce wonderful dogs and family pets. We looked into the bichi-poo, but the mother (poodle) was so ugly we went with a straight bichon. This "purebred is better" mentality makes me wonder what these people think of people of mixed races having children. I just think it's all good, as long as you have healthy parents, you have a great chance at getting a good dog.
Jackie
goofy! said:I believe that story is slowly being debunked. Yes, a couple of the dogs were originally bred to see if it would work. As with any mix, nobody could guarantee what the outcome would be. A curly-coated, but shedding puppy? Which ones had the poodle and which ones had the lab temperament? There was no consistency. It usually takes numerous generations (years) of careful selection and breeding to achieve any kind of consistency of breed type. From what I have heard, more and more, it is now being revealed that the service dog story was just an excuse to "create" a new breed.
) and I want a pure-bred pure and simple. With a pure bred ... a Standard Poodle, or a Komondor, or a Portuguese Water Dog or a Giant Schnauzer ... I know what I am getting in disposition and coat. As long as I do my homework first. With a cross like a labradoodle ... I could end up a too-smart lab {{shudder}}.wwithers said:And if you still want a "laberdoodle" just go to your local shelter where so many have been dumped since the craze has subsided.![]()