jenseib
Mommy to Claire
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2006
- Messages
- 30,734
Ok, ladies (since you said ask away..... you may end up regretting that) take this picture for example. This may sound stupid, but it has the SLR "look" to me. Maybe it is b/c part is in focus and part is out of focus???? Those types of pictures seem to have that SLR look (sorry but I have no better way to describe it than that). Is this something that can only be done with a SLR or (if I can figure it out) can it be done with a high end point and shoot? For the most part, I feel like my pictures are almost as crisp and clear as ones I see from an SLR, they just don't have that depth feel to them. If that is something that my camera can do, then I'd like to just practice that technique before I take the plunge. I hope this doesn't sound completely dumb!
Btw, I just noticed it, but that one guy has some really big hair!![]()
For a blurred backgorund you will do much better with and SLR. I use a wide open aperture, which can be done with a manual setting on a point and shoot, but P & S's have different lenses (I don't know the technical terms off hand) and they get more depth of field at the same settings. To get less depth, like this picture and many of my flower pictures, you want to have a wide open aperture. I personally like that look too. I have actually been trying to get more depth in some pictures as I play around, just to get out of my groove. A great book to help understand this is "Understanding Exposure".
This is the copy I have, but I'm pretty sure there is an updated version...let me look for that link too.
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Exposure-Photographs-Digital-Updated/dp/0817463003
Yep, here it is
http://www.amazon.com/Understanding...=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1306263482&sr=1-1