70-200mm lenses

1:4 means that the largest "in focus" image you can create on your sensor with that lens is 1/4 the size of the object in real life. If you move closer, you'll either have to zoom out, you won't be able to focus, or both. As Groucho already said, 1:1 would mean that the image on the sensor can be as large as the object you are photographing. Of course, you can print the image at whatever size you want.

There is nothing magical about any particular magnification ratio, but it is a nice way to compare lenses. If you find yourself out in the field wanting to take a picture of a small flower, you can check the magnification ratio of your lenses and quickly see which one will give you the most magnification.

You can increase the magnification ratio of any lens by adding extension tubes or a closeup filter. Extension tubes work by moving the lens further from the camera. That helps because the closer you get to an object, the further back the lens focuses the image. By moving the lens further from the camera, you can get closer to the object and still stay in focus. A closeup lens works pretty much like putting a magnifying glass on your lens.

As for the switch, Master Mason's explanation is correct. Under normal circumstances, it doesn't matter. At times when your lens loses focus and has to start hunting, it reduces the range over which it needs to hunt. There are times when this is really handy, like shooting flying birds or planes. With either of those, when you lose track, your camera tries to focus on the sky, which has insufficient constrast for the auto-focus. In that case, it just starts roaming the entire focus range. When you catch up to your bird or plane again, the focus could be way off. The switch just limits how far off it can get.

Thanks
so it would be better to use the 3m in those cases?..i did notice that yesterday when i was taking some birds at the beach but forget which it was on now
 
so it would be better to use the 3m in those cases?

Yes. If it lost focus, it would hunt between 3m and infinity rather than 1.2m and infinity. That means that it can't get as far out of focus. Of course, this assumes that what you want to shoot is 3m or more away.
 
Afaik the 1:4 just means f/4. My 50 f/1.8 says 1:1.8, my 55-200 says 1:4.5-5.6.

As noted, the focus range switch can give quicker focusing if you don't need the close focus. The amount of rotation from 3m to 1.2m is a lot.

Let me know when you get caught trying to focus close with the focus switch in the 3m position and can't figure what is wrong for a few seconds, then use the special Canon words (@#$%^&*). It still happens to me now and then. ;)
 
to late, i already did that...not sure if they were official canon words though since mine were more related to the abject fear i felt when i thought i had another lens with :scared1: :scared1: :scared1: a "lens problem" (think sound of psycho shower scene sound track) that needed repair.. i could have used up a bunch of canon words if i did
 

I'm renting the Canon 70-200 IS L for 3 weeks and Holy Cow! I love this L Glass. I think I'm addicted. lol

I didn't have many willing subjects today unfortunately, so here are a just a few photos to share.

IMG_8331.jpg


IMG_8532.jpg


I can't decide if I like this last one or not. This is SOOC. It needs straightening obviously.
IMG_8525.jpg
 
oh I am so envious. I'm not sure where to rent around here. Maybe I should check into it. BUT I am also concerned that if I do try it - I won't be happy until it is mine.

have fun and keep posting your pics.
 
Nice shots!! I think that is a great way to make sure that you want to sink the bucks into pro grade glass before you actually buy!! Now you need a "I gotta have this lens" fund!!:woohoo:
 
Looks like you have the f/2.8 version. Very Nice!!!
 
Oh, I didn't rent local. I rented from http://www.lensrentals.com I have a few other places on my list too (if your interested). ;)

Oh coooool. Looks like it is more of a Canon place, but does have Nikon stuff too. I like that you can reserve a lens. Their stock seems better than rentglass.com. Prices are still good too. I might have to rent something just to try out something new.

I'll definately keep them in mind for my next Disney trip in Nov.

Thanks for the link.

Enjoy that lens while you have it.
 
Does anyone know why it matters that there are two settings for IS on this lens? I was doing alot of panning shots today and I just urned the IS off but now I realixe that I could have switched it to mode 2 on the lens. Is this helpful? I think my shots came out alright without the IS, but that was mostly due to the 1/4000 shutter speed, not my steady hand, however the ones shot at like 1/250 still came out good. I had the lens at 200mm with the 1.4X teleconverter. My shots that were taken at 1/30 had some problems, but I was looking for the blurred movement of panning a fast subject anyways. Any suggestions on whether or not I should use this "mode 2" IS in these situations?

Thanks in advance.
 
I recently saw that this lens was available for pre-order at B&H and Adorama. It is priced at $699. I have tried to find reviews on this lens and have not been able to find much. Has anyone else seen any reviews? I would like to purchase a 2.8 zoom at some point and at this price, the Tamron looks pretty interesting. Wonder how it compares to the $900 Nikon 80-200?
 
The lens has not been released, hence it will be a while til reviews hit the net.

My guess based on other Tamron lenses is that the biggest issue will be build quality, while optical quality should be above expectations given the price.
 
It was supposed to be out last month, I think. The latest I've heard is that it's been delayed until the summer.

I am very interested in this lens, so I'm anxiously awaiting release and some feedback from early buyers and reviews. The hope is that, quality-wise, it'll be comparable to their 28-75mm F2.8. The stats on paper certainly look good.

Sigma is also released an updated version of their 70-200mm F2.8 in the next couple months, but I'm not sure what their price will be.
 
Sigma is also released an updated version of their 70-200mm F2.8 in the next couple months, but I'm not sure what their price will be.
Sigma pretty much updates that lens on an annual basis, street prices have been in the low $800 range even after each update.
 
Since getting my Sigma 30/1.4 and being extremely happy with it I am now considering my second non-Nikkor lens- a Sigma 24-70/2.8. I can't swing the Nikon version at the moment- $1699 *cough* so for around $400 the Sigma seems like a pretty good value to cover the range at f2.8.

Thoughts? Anyone have this or an alternate they like?
 
Since getting my Sigma 30/1.4 and being extremely happy with it I am now considering my second non-Nikkor lens- a Sigma 24-70/2.8. I can't swing the Nikon version at the moment- $1699 *cough* so for around $400 the Sigma seems like a pretty good value to cover the range at f2.8.

Thoughts? Anyone have this or an alternate they like?

I looked at it for a while before going with the canon, It has a good rep. Deleted Penguin uses it to great effect.
 
I considered it before going with the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8. Both get quite favorable reviews. My research suggested that the Tamron gets the edge, although not by much. In fact, IIRC it was a couple of regulars here (Groucho and I can't remember who else) who tipped the balance for me. I also decided that I would want something wider than either of them, so the extra range on that end wasn't a deciding factor.
 
Not got the 24-70mm, but I recently got the 70mm f2.8 Sigma and I am very happy with it. I should imagine that it would be similar in quality to the 24-70, so would highly recommend it.
 
Ya, I use it, though the Canon equivilent. Sigma makes great lenses, and it's sharp. Granted, it's not AS fast as some of the Canon L lenses I have, but it's got pretty good IQ and great, vibrant colours. It's a great lens, especially for 1/4 of the price.

I've got heaps of photos that I've taken with this lens (it was my walkaround lense at Disneyland the last few times), but this one probably shows some of its best qualities. Especially since it was taken at ISO 1600.

2009649992_882faebaf4.jpg


Camera: Canon EOS 30D
Exposure: 0.05 sec (1/20)
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 34 mm
ISO Speed: 1600
Exposure Bias: 0/3 EV
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom