MichaelaF
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- May 20, 2012
- Messages
- 450
I'm no insider, so take it for what it's worth, but from what I've been hearing, they aren't exactly rolling in $$ Scrooge McDuck style, having put so much into FP+ last year. A number of places have indicated that's why a lot of the announcements that we thought for sure were coming at the end of last year (Star Wars, Cars Land, etc) didn't come, because they were put on hold. Some of the more fantastical theories out there (that I don't entirely buy into, but probably hold some water) talk about how the money issue has affected things like expansion/parking in DLR and things like the Nemo subs being essentially grounded for the year as a cost-saving measure. I think they are just now starting to dig out from that money pit that is FP+ roll out, and getting themselves into a position where they can move forward on FW at Epcot and the issues at DHS.
I completely agree with this, Mel. When we went last year, I was surprised at how many things needed work. Which isn't to say that they aren't still usually light-years above many other theme parks, they often are. But with Universal playing some solid cards in this game up the street, movement has to be made. I actually thought maybe it was in my head somehow, since I hadn't been since I was a teen - that I just remembered it being TOO perfect when I was younger - until we went to Disneyland 5 months later.
Let me be clear - I love both WDW and DL and I think they both have their strengths and weaknesses (compared to the other). And it's no secret that DLR went through it's own downturn in the 80s (my mom, a die-hard Disney fan, remembers HATING it during the infamous Paul Pressler years). But I'd be lying if I said I didn't notice a marked difference in the management, cast members, upkeep and cleanliness. Granted, DL is a smaller operation, I get that. But it was noticeable. And I'd been to WDW recently enough I think to make a fair comparison. The magic was different there. And that's one reason that we chose to go to DLR later this year, instead of back to WDW.
The last thing that is a must is for them to remember part of what always made WDW so amazingly special was how perfect everything was. To have rides in the MK so in need of a bit of TLC that speakers are broken, paint is faded and chipped, parts of the ride cars are broken as well as other things is really unbelievable. How has that been allowed to happen? Whoever is in charge of that stuff really needs to get their act together, or be given the resources to make it happen...
I completely agree with this, Mel. When we went last year, I was surprised at how many things needed work. Which isn't to say that they aren't still usually light-years above many other theme parks, they often are. But with Universal playing some solid cards in this game up the street, movement has to be made. I actually thought maybe it was in my head somehow, since I hadn't been since I was a teen - that I just remembered it being TOO perfect when I was younger - until we went to Disneyland 5 months later.
Let me be clear - I love both WDW and DL and I think they both have their strengths and weaknesses (compared to the other). And it's no secret that DLR went through it's own downturn in the 80s (my mom, a die-hard Disney fan, remembers HATING it during the infamous Paul Pressler years). But I'd be lying if I said I didn't notice a marked difference in the management, cast members, upkeep and cleanliness. Granted, DL is a smaller operation, I get that. But it was noticeable. And I'd been to WDW recently enough I think to make a fair comparison. The magic was different there. And that's one reason that we chose to go to DLR later this year, instead of back to WDW.