Mickmse2002
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2002
- Messages
- 606
Very sad indeed. It will be very interesting to see if we hear anything in the future as to cause.
Maria395712 said:prayers for this family
I lost my 2 yr old in a tragic accident 24 yr ago june 4 th It will never be forgotton by the family
they said his sister was on the ride with him so very sad for her
he was allowed because they said he met height requirement of 44 inches that is in the news article
maria
Maria395712 said:prayers for this family
I lost my 2 yr old in a tragic accident 24 yr ago june 4 th It will never be forgotton by the family
they said his sister was on the ride with him so very sad for her
he was allowed because they said he met height requirement of 44 inches that is in the news article
maria
Your exactly right. I just don't see how the ride alone could have caused this.thedscoop said:This is obviously a tragedy. From following it this morning, the situation sounds analogous to the recent spate of high school football practice deaths in that the practice/ride triggered a previously unknown condition.
Note: that is much different than saying M:S caused the death by creating an event that otherwise would not have occured (such as a spinal cord injury).
Maistre Gracey said:Your exactly right. I just don't see how the ride alone could have caused this.
MG
ETC alleges that Disney has refused both to allow it to participate in the safety testing of Mission: Space and to provide it with data to assure that the ride is safe. Its role in testing the safety of the ride, it states, was spelled out in its initial contract with Disney.
In fact, ETC states, "the chief executive officer of The Walt Disney Co., Michael Eisner, informed ETC that, rather than have the work done 'in house' at Disney by its 'imagineers,' Disney specifically wanted ETC to build the ride due to its experience with centrifuge systems."
"If ETC is prevented from using its years of experience with human centrifuge systems to participate in the safety testing and analysis (of the ride) ... then there are increased risks of injury to the public at large, and the associated increased risk of irreparable damage to ETC's reputation," the company states in the suit.
The website Chad references is, of course, one of Chad's personal websites.official Disney World statements, and some additional legal info on the incident are now posted
My understanding (which is great term to use if you need to avoid taking any responsibility for the claim later proving to be an out-and-out lie) is that Disney's concern about ETC's testing effort was how long it was going to take and how much it was going to cost.My understanding is that, because of some concerns about ETC's testing effort