Originally posted by clkelley
Also, I can see why a person that although doesn't have a limiting mobility problem, but an endurance problem, might consider this a mobility device.
Carol
Well, an endurance problem, by definition, would limit mobility. However, it is a far cry from what the ADA would consider disabled and, because of that, anyone having an "endurance problem" would not be able to request an accommodation for use of such a vehicle if they wished to use it in a public place, such as WDW.
The ADA standards of disability, through DOJ interpretation and Supreme Court decisions are very different from what people have come to consider as disabled. Simply having a physical or mental impairment, malady, restriction, unpleasant medical condition, or aggravating problem does not result in a
person being disabled under the ADA. Receiving Social Security Disability Income or
Supplemental Security Income from the Social Security Administration does
not mean that a person is disabled under the standards of the ADA. A person
must have a "substantial limitation" of the ability to engage in one or more
"major life activities" in order to be disabled under the ADA and in order
to have the right to request an accommodation to a business policy, such as one that bans pets, limits parking time, prohibits the use of personal motorized devices, etc. Through decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States
a "substantial limitation" has been defined as an almost complete inability.