ntsammy5
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 12,094
This has been in the news quite a lot lately - would you support a return to a 18 YO drinking age?
I know when I was growing up the drinking age was 18 and I don't remember a lot of problems because of it. When my kids were growing up the drinking age was 21 BUT we live 15 minutes from Ontario, Canada where the drinking age was and is 19. No significant problems there either.
The argument that you can vote and serve in the military at 18 are both compelling arguments - I support it.
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080820/GJNEWS_01/1871/-1/FOSNEWS
I know when I was growing up the drinking age was 18 and I don't remember a lot of problems because of it. When my kids were growing up the drinking age was 21 BUT we live 15 minutes from Ontario, Canada where the drinking age was and is 19. No significant problems there either.
The argument that you can vote and serve in the military at 18 are both compelling arguments - I support it.
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080820/GJNEWS_01/1871/-1/FOSNEWS
By JASON CLAFFEY
jclaffey@fosters.com
Article Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008
DURHAM — Calls to lower the drinking age, which seem to be an annual occurrence since Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act in 1984, this time are being trumpeted from an unlikely source: a group of more than 100 college presidents and chancellors calling themselves the "Amethyst Initiative."
No, they didn't steal the title from the television series "Lost" — "amethyst" is derived from the ancient Greek words "a" (not) and "methustos" (intoxicated) — and they are hoping their institutional profile will, according to a statement on the group's website, "support an informed and dispassionate public debate over the effects of the 21-year-old drinking age."
The group, which was started by Middlebury College President Emeritus John McCardell earlier this year, has had representatives from such high-profile schools as Dartmouth College, Duke University and the University of Maryland-College Park sign its mission statement. The University of New Hampshire has not signed on, though Southern New Hampshire University has.
Local college students and bar owners said in interviews they were skeptical the debate will actually lead to a lowering of the drinking age, but SHNU President Paul LeBlanc said it's still a discussion worth having.
"This question has been almost untouchable," he said, adding that the the 21-year-old minimum drinking age has created more problems than it has solved, at least on college campuses.
"The problem is it drives drinking behaviors off campus and into places we can't manage," he said.
Having a lower drinking age, such as 18, would encourage students to stay on campus where they would be surrounded by a "safety net," LeBlanc argued. Doing so would "create a culture where healthier drinking habits occur," he said.
UNH spokeswoman Kim Billings said in statement that university President Mark Huddleston supports expanding the drinking age conversation because alcohol abuse is a recurring problem.
That said, "We expect our students to obey all alcohol laws, and will ensure that our own enforcement activities are consistent with the law."
Durham police did not return a phone call seeking comment Tuesday.
Whether alcohol use is an issue at UNH depends on who you ask.
According to the Princeton Review, UNH is ranked third in how widely alcohol is used on campus and 11th in terms of being a "party school." Those rankings are based primarily on online surveys conducted by 120,000 students at 368 schools across the country.
Graham Camire, co-owner of Scorpions Bar and Grill in Durham, which is frequented by UNH students, said the school's party reputation is overplayed. Camire graduated from UNH in 2001 and said he remembers the party scene being much greater in the 1990s.
From a financial standpoint, Camire said a lowered drinking age would obviously be a windfall for bar owners, but he was wary of the effects of suddenly allowing a greater swath of the student population to drink legally.
"I don't want to see 18-year-old kids running around here," Camire said at his bar Tuesday, which was empty of students because classes do not start until September.
He was skeptical that the drinking age would ever be lowered.
The National Minimum Drinking Age Act was passed in 1984, when Congress responded to calls from Mothers Against Drunk Driving to increase the drinking age. Studies have shown that drunken driving- and binge drinking-related deaths decreased in the late 1980s and 1990s, though LeBlanc questioned the data that backed up those trends.
He said improved car safety measures like airbags and seat belts, coupled with more effective law enforcement, could have been responsible for the drop in alcohol-related deaths.
LeBlanc said educational programs and a reduced drinking age would do much more to alleviate alcohol abuse on campus than having the minimum drinking age at 21 and advocating abstinence.
"Prohibition has taught us that abstinence doesn't work," he said.
State Rep. Emma Rous, D-Durham, said discussing the drinking law is a reasonable thing to do, but added that alcohol abuse is rooted in deeper issues like the perception among incoming students that drinking in college is a coming-of-age activity.
"I don't think the drinking-age law is the magic bullet," she said.
To Celeste Eno and Lucy Pleticha, both 23-year-old graduate students at UNH, the drinking age debate is one that is not worth having with everything else going on in the country, from the war in Iraq to the state of the economy.
"There's a lot more to worry about," Pleticha said.
Even if the drinking age was lowered, Eno said it wouldn't change students' drinking habits.
"People seem to drink whatever their age," she said.
) Where we were in Sicily, there wasn't many "drunkin incidences". And there was a lot of "under 21" drinking, but it was legal. Sometimes I think the "youth" today are just out of control and they would go crazy with that priviledge, however, they do it anyway. Maybe if it wasn't such a thrill to have private parties and drink to get drunk there wouldn't be such a draw to it. If they could just drink in public maybe there would be a little more responsibilty. I don't know.
) you could drink at 18. It just wasn't a big deal. My husband remembers being able to grab a beer after work, this was also during the Viet Nam war. Anyone who thinks their kid isn't going to drink until they're 21..they are either very naive, or they haven't reached the point where they have kids that age. Again, I would say that education is the most important factor in detering drinking and driving, and that would be at any age. My kids have always been allowed to drink in our home. I have never, and would never condone or give alcohol to any other minor. However, if my kids are 18 and we are having wine with dinner, or beer, they have been allowed to have one. They don't get in a car, or abuse the privilge. It's been my experience with my kids..and through their friends, that every kid under 21 drinks..and when they do, it's WAY to much. Why is that? Because they don't know when or if they're gonna be able to get it again. So they drink it like there's no tomorrow. There is no "social drinking" aspect to it. When we were 18 if we wanted to have a beer or a drink we could. I'm not saying we never got drunk..but we didn't look at liquor as if it was this forbidden fruit, and we better make the most of it while we have it. We could have it whenever we wanted..and I feel knowing you can have it if you want it takes some of the allure out it. Every year at graduation time you hear of these high school graduates going on vacations to the Bahamas or to Mexico..why?...because they want to travel. Give me a break..They want to drink..and they do so in excess. Sometimes to the point of killing themselves, and placing themselves at terrible risk for God only knows what.

Sure hope there is a statute of limitations on it or I'm going away for life!