.CEDmom said:I don't know whether my DD is being taught this is school. I do know the nurse visits classes on a regular basis to talk about a whole variety of things and I would imagine this is one of them. It doesn't really matter though, she's known the real names since she could talk.
I remember when she was about 2 or 3 and we were talking about how boys are different than girls. I explained what boys had vs. what girls had. She sat and quietly took it all in. That night DH came home and DD ran up to him as usual. She then proceeded to tell him not to worry that be didn't have a 'gina because we'd go to the 'gina store and get him one![]()
![]()
.
mickeyboat said:I have been open and honest with my girls, and they know the real names of what boys have and what girls have, but they generally collectively call them their privates. In K last year they had the lesson from the school counselor about good touch bad touch, and were taught about the "bathing suit" area as being private as well. It's a one piece, BTW.
Denae
C.Ann said:------------------------------------
How cute is that?
The school really made a big deal out of this on "Back To School Night" and kind of caught my DD and her DH off guard because of the way it was handled in her former school..
"Daddy" comes from a VERY modest family and I don't think he knew the "proper" terms until he learned them from his buddies..![]()

beckmrk04 said:I plan on teaching my children the proper names for their genitals. I don't think it's that big of a deal- it's what I call them and what doctors call them...
But, CEDmom- the 'gina store is cracking me up!!!![]()
. It's all DH could do to thank her without busting a gut.So did you get DH his own 'gina?CEDmom said:Given all you've been through you deserve a laugh. I've been waiting for a reason to tell that story. It's one of my favorites because she was so serious about it. It's all DH could do to thank her without busting a gut.

It would take alot more than knowledge of the proper terms for body parts for a defense atty to have a legit argument of abuse.C.Ann said:I remember hearing of a number of cases where children were sexually abused and defense attorneys for the accused would often use the argument that children that young would not know the proper terms for such body parts or sexual activities and therefore must have been "coached"..
Any thoughts on this?
That is really, really sad. I can't imagine how horrible the teacher must have felt. That would haunt me.phillybeth said:I don't think kids necessarily need to know the medical terms for body parts. HOWEVER, please do not used 'cutesy' terms- call them private parts, or girl/boy parts, or something that gets the point across.
The reason is: I was involved in a child sexual assault case where a little girl had been taught to call her girl parts her 'flower'. She had told her daycare teacher repeatedly that her uncle touched her flower, but because the teacher didn't know that to this child, flower= girl parts, the abuse went unreported- until the child wound up with a gonorrhea infection in her THROAT.![]()
So please parents, don't use cutesy terms.

When he started school I used to get complaints from the teachers that no one could understand him, because of his vocabulary.
Unfortunately, we didn't know this before he started school or we'd have prepared him for it.
He finally asked if he was allowed to say "poop".
Although my DDIL told me last year that she still can't understand half of what he says. 
phillybeth said:I
So please parents, don't use cutesy terms.
mickeyfan2 said:So did you get DH his own 'gina?![]()
.