MAGICFOR2
Condimentessa
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 11,044
True, but the WDFM is two bus rides from where the ship docks. And I am familiar enough with SF that it is no problem to get there.
And I understand the need to make a profit, but if the cost of going to Alkatraz through the cruise line is more than double the cost of doing it on your own, the markup seems excessive to me.
If you don't have a strong interest in riding across the Golden Gate bridge, then here's an alternative. First, look at the DCL website and note for yourself that their description of going to Alcatraz involves walking from the ship to the ferry. Next, go to Google Maps and search 'cruise terminal san francisco'. You will see the cruise ship terminal is at pier 35, and Alcatraz tours leave from pier 33 next door. You'll save a lot of money by not having somebody escort you half a block. If you want to go to Sausalito, the ferry leaves from pier 41 - also displayed on Google maps and about three blocks away from pier 35. I expect most cruise passengers will be walking that way regardless of the ferry in order to visit Fisherman's Wharf.
Since I don't drink alcohol, let's use the example of a restaurant. I can cook baby back ribs at home over five hours and have something better than restaurants can make for a lot less, or I can save a lot of time and spend a lot more. But gouging depends on how much more I am paying.
No, $75 for WDW doesn't seem excessive. To me, it seems a bit cheap compared to other theme parks. But paying $99 to get a $26 trip to Alcatraz and about a $20 trip to Sausalito seems excessive to me.
And this will be my last post on the subject. You and I obviously have very different opinions of what a fair price is. You also seem to think taking the time to get to know a destination is difficult, but I have enough leisure time - and enough desire - to want to learn these things. Before I get on an airplane I know roughly how to get from the hotel to my destination and I can quickly tell if the cabbie is taking a long route - or going in the wrong direction. I consider such information vital to personal security, and am willing to pay for this knowledge with my time.
Which one of us is right? In the case of San Francisco, probably both. You obviously have enough money that the extra money for DCL tours is no big deal; I am not as affluent. In the tourist sections San Francisco during the day, personal security information is not that necessary. Elsewhere your life can depend on it - a former coworker jumped out of a moving taxi to escape being kidnapped for ransom, ran two blocks to a safe hotel, and may have saved his own life.
While you are on the subject of safety, I just wanted to tell everyone that my nail tech got mugged at night down by the wharf, after someone had slipped her husband a mickey in his drink at a nearby bar. He could barely stand up, and she had gone over to a booth of some kind to try to get help or a taxi. She was beat up pretty badly. (I know most are probably from a large city and are used to avoiding situations, but we are from a small town and personal safety is not as much a concern. ) When you are in an unfamiliar environment and on vacation, sometimes it is easy to forget you are in the "real world."