PatriciaH
I want to be an Imagineer!
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2002
If the reporter had the DCL incident report, he should have published it. If he didn't have the report he had to rely on someone telling him what the report says. Not saying the report is wrong, just saying there are a lot of unanswered questions.
Assuming a 'motive' suggests foul play and this could very easily be one person's ignorance of the law.
The original story had the picture of the report published. The names of the people were blacked out, but it was from DCL.