cewait
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2000
Thanks you two.
Coach, yeah wouldn't it make more sense for the full cutoff to be at least twice the half cutoff? So, anything under 5:30 would need proof. I don't think it would be unreasonable for them to ask that of people.
I would need to go through some older stuff, but I think the half cutoff was in the 2:30 range when they started asking for proof of time. At the time, both races were run concurrent so it made sense to have the same pace runner offer proof for the same corral. Once the races were split, the standard was raised as the half race grew.
I just reviewed the corral assignment times earlier today and think there could be some merit in raising the time standard to 5:15 or 5:30 in the near future. The corral immediately following the proof required corral was those claiming the fastest non-proofed time and the following corral was 5:30. I think the race could smooth the line here by moving the standard up to a 5:15. I think it a tough sell to push it up to 5:30 as a huge percentage of the 5:00 even estimates will fall to 5:15 if the proof standard is revised.
My thoughts are that a direct doubling of the full proof of time standard is probably not warranted but that some increase may be necessary to help clear out the log jam in the first corral immediately after the last corral requiring a proof.