CampbellzSoup
Son. Husband. Father.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2014
Wouldn't Wall-E be a better fit for tomorowland than wreck it Ralph? That just doesn't fit to me.
Off topic...sort of....but I sure wish that they'd do a tiny update on Carousel of Progress....it has always been a great spot to sit down and unload in cool air, but boy, it smells so old, carpet and chairs are stained....it has the appearance that it is holding on for dear life!
I agree, I love CoP, but it desperately needs new carpet and chairs. It's horrible that they've allowed it to sink into that condition.
Hear, hear. It desperately needs some TLC. Not to mention that the "present" day stage is badly out-dated now. I think they need to resurrect the original 1960s scene, or do a "future" scene instead of trying to stay current. It is almost impossible to keep that last stage looking fresh and up to date while trying to stay in the present. Things change too often.
They recently added a flat screen TV! That's "progress!"
Actually we enjoy the Country Bears (once) every trip. My daughter (11) was upset that they didn't have them at Disneyland last year. Of course we like all kinds of humor, even the corny kind.Country Bears please just go away already. I can honestly say that i know no one that considers the Country Bears as a top 50 things to at MK
Actually we enjoy the Country Bears (once) every trip. My daughter (11) was upset that they didn't have them at Disneyland last year. Of course we like all kinds of humor, even the corny kind.
...and a great big puddle....of blood on the ground...
I always have to see the Country Bears at least once for nostalgia purposes. CoP is always fun, but that flat-screen TV just plunked in there did crack me up. (To be fair, it was after midnight and we were the only ones in the theater. I might have gotten carried away.)
I seem to have missed the Alien years, but remember when Stitch was Mission to Mars; my guess is they'll change that one eventually.
I'm not sure folks have included a simple idea - if Disney is at full capacity now, even with all the recently added hotel rooms, why add any new attractions if they cannot generate additional profits?
Profits drive the equation.I don't get this philosophy - if Disney doesn't stay ahead of things, then they get left behind. Should they only make attraction refurbs/reboots or add new attractions once attendance goes down? Should they just react when needed and not be proactive? You'd only realize that attendance was down way after the trend starts because attendance is seasonal/cyclical anyway. I'd hate to think that Disney would only make a change AFTER attendance was noticeably/significantly down, after accounting for any changes in the economy or whatever. That would be so short-sighted and poor business sense.
Having said that, I certainly don't think that Disney has any plans to make any major changes to MK, not after NFL just opened and the need to focus on HS, AK, and Epcot.
I don't get this philosophy - if Disney doesn't stay ahead of things, then they get left behind. Should they only make attraction refurbs/reboots or add new attractions once attendance goes down? Should they just react when needed and not be proactive? You'd only realize that attendance was down way after the trend starts because attendance is seasonal/cyclical anyway. I'd hate to think that Disney would only make a change AFTER attendance was noticeably/significantly down, after accounting for any changes in the economy or whatever. That would be so short-sighted and poor business sense.
Having said that, I certainly don't think that Disney has any plans to make any major changes to MK, not after NFL just opened and the need to focus on HS, AK, and Epcot.
Wouldn't Wall-E be a better fit for tomorowland than wreck it Ralph? That just doesn't fit to me.
It could easily be considered a part of Fantasyland instead of Tomorrowland.